The Washington Post

Short headline

Given that Mitt Romney says one thing and then he says another (in the debate he said he wouldn’t cut education funding even though he has been supporting a budget that does just that), it isn’t easy to know just what he would do.

But in this article in the Phi Delta Kappan magazine, Rick Hess of the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative Washington D.C. think tank, takes a shot at figuring it out.

Noting that education would be “a secondary concern” for a Republican president and that “some caution is required in “divining Romney’s core beliefs,”  he concludes: “The safe bet is that a President Romney would keep much of the same substantive agenda as Obama, but would do so with a lighter touch, less spending, and more emphasis on choice.

Hess does mention, of course, that one of the biggest areas where the two men disagree is on vouchers; Romney wants to create vouchers across the country and Obama doesn’t. It’s a big, big difference.

Valerie Strauss covers education and runs The Answer Sheet blog.


Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read


Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Don’t be ‘that’ sports parent | On Parenting
Miss Manners: The technology's changed, but the rules are the same
A flood of refugees from Syria but only a trickle to America
Play Videos
John Lewis, 'Marv the Barb' and the politics of barber shops
Kids share best advice from mom
Using Fitbit to help kids lose weight
Play Videos
This man's job is binge-watching for Netflix
Transgender swimmer now on Harvard men's team
Portland's most important meal of the day
Play Videos
5 ways to raise girls to be leaders
How much can one woman eat?
The signature drink of New Orleans