The Washington Post

What’s missing from this hearing on teachers?

Congressional hearings are supposed to provide lawmakers wth information they need to make policy and legislative decisions. But sometimes, when you look at the witness lists, it is hard to figure out why legislators bother to hold them.

Take the hearing being held on Tuesday by the House Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education, chaired by Republican Rep. Duncan Hunter from California. It is called “Education Reforms: Discussing the Value of Alternative Teacher Certification Programs.”

The official media release on the hearing lets you know that the committee members already think there is a lot of value to alternative teacher certification routes. It says in part:

“Many schools have turned to teachers certified through alternative routes to help fill shortages in particular geographic areas, fields, and classrooms with unique student needs. Each year, approximately one third of teachers obtain their certification through alternate routes. These capable educators often bring a wide range of real-world experience that strengthens the overall quality of the teaching profession.”

The hearing is designed to allow panel members “to learn more” about these programs, but will they with the witnesses they have chosen to listen to?

Here’s the witness list:

* Jennifer Mulhern, vice president for new teacher effectiveness, TNTP (The New Teacher Project, which was led for 10 years by Michelle Rhee), Baltimore, MD

* Maura O. Banta, director of citizenship initiatives in education, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY

* Cynthia G. Brown, vice president for education policy, Center for American Progress, Washington D.C.

* Seth Andrew, founder and superintendent, Democracy Prep Public Charter Schools, New York, NY

These witnesses surely are highly knowledgeable people, but they have hardly been at the forefront of research and practice about the kind of prepration teachers must have to be successful with children, especially special-needs students.

If the panel is really interested in understanding teacher certification, you’d think they would have brought in a classroom teacher or two, some experts on special education, a state director of certification, and/or researchers on teaching such as Stanford University’s renowned Linda Darling-Hammond.

Of course the panel would actually have to want to hear something it doesn’t already know.


Follow The Answer Sheet every day by bookmarking .

Valerie Strauss covers education and runs The Answer Sheet blog.


Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read


Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Sleep advice you won't find in baby books
In defense of dads
Scenes from Brazil's Carajás Railway
Play Videos
For good coffee, sniff, slurp and spit
How to keep your child safe in the water
How your online data can get hijacked
Play Videos
How to avoid harmful chemicals in school supplies
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
How much can one woman eat?
Play Videos
What you need to know about Legionnaires' disease
How to get organized for back to school
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom