The Washington Post

Holding Broad Academy and Bush Institute ‘accountable’


Jeb Bush is holding his fifth annual national summit on school reform next month in Washington D.C. According to the agenda, one of the

(J. Scott Applewhite/AP)

strategy sessions is called “Transforming Colleges of Education,” and the writeup says in part: “Nine out of every ten teachers graduate from traditional teacher prep programs at colleges of education. Should these colleges be held accountable for the caliber of students they admit into their programs and the teachers they send into the classroom?”

Bush and like-minded school reformers — including President Obama’s education secretary, Arne Duncan — have been very clear in saying that indeed, education schools should be held accountable. In fact, Duncan’s Education Department wants regulations that would rate colleges of education in part on how K-12 students being taught by their graduates perform on standardized tests. In addition, financial aid to students in these programs would not be based entirely on need but, rather, would also be linked to test scores.

 So if they want to hold teacher training programs accountable, why not do the same thing for the Broad Academy‘s  program that trains and places top administrators in urban school districts across the country?

And what about the George W. Bush Institute’s principal training program? The website says about the Alliance to Reform Education Leadership: “The program is designed for the express purpose of producing and placing school principals who dramatically improve student learning and sustain that improvement. While graduates of school leadership programs may also serve in other leadership capacities at the campus and district level, the focus of the AREL project is on preparing and empowering principals.”

Why shouldn’t the superintendents, administrators and principals placed by these programs be held accountable in the same way — by student test scores?

Of course no adult should be assessed based on the standardized test scores of students, but if colleges of education are going to be targeted, why should the Broad and Bush training programs be exempt?

Valerie Strauss covers education and runs The Answer Sheet blog.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
Perks of private flying
Drawing as an act of defiance
Play Videos
Husband finds love, loss in baseball
Bao: The signature dish of San Francisco
From foster homes to the working world
Play Videos
How soccer is helping Philadelphia men kick the streets
Here's why you hate the sound of your own voice
The woman behind the Nats’ presidents ‘Star Wars’ makeover
Play Videos
How hackers can control your car from miles away
How to avoid harmful chemicals in school supplies
How much can one woman eat?
Next Story
Valerie Strauss · October 10, 2012

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.