The Washington Post

Survey: Admission directors increasingly favor ‘full-pay’ students

With revenue declining, college admission officials are looking harder for students who can pay full fare, according to a survey released today by Inside Higher Ed.

The 2011 Survey of College and University Admission Directors finds evidence that admission committees are not being quite so holistic — or impartial — as they claim.

Among all four-year colleges, the admission strategy “judged most important over the next two years” was to recruit more out-of-state students, a group that typically pays sharply higher tuition at public institutions. Private institutions don’t charge higher tuition to out-of-state students but do rely on international students, who often come from wealthy families and pay the full cost of attendance.

The survey found that recruiting larger numbers of “full-pay” students, those who receive no financial aid, was viewed as a “key goal” at public institutions. Providing aid for low-income students was cited as a lower priority.

Dozens of colleges profess on their Web sites to a policy of admitting students without regard to financial need. Yet, the Inside Higher Ed survey found that 10 percent of four-year colleges reported admitting full-pay students with lower grades and test scores than other admitted students.

Roughly one-quarter of admission directors reported pressure from someone — college administrators, trustees or fund-raisers — to admit a student irrespective of her or his qualifications to attend. Admission preferences made big news recently two years ago at the University of Illinois.

Even at community colleges, a sector known for full access, one-third of admission directors said admitting full-pay students was “an important strategy.” Two-thirds said their central focus remains serving students who lack financial resources.

One-fifth of admission directors reported using commission-based agents to recruit international students, a practice that is widely regarded as unethical. Nearly half said they believed such agents help their clients fabricate information, such as admission essays written by others.

Show Comments
Most Read


Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing