Titled “A Happy Holiday IS a Merry Christmas,” it seems destined to go the same route as most books with CAPITAL LETTERS in their TITLES for EMPHASIS. From the official statement, as the AP reports:
“Amidst the fragility of this politically correct era, it is imperative that we stand up for our beliefs before the element of faith in a glorious and traditional holiday like Christmas is marginalized and ignored,” Palin said in a statement released through her publisher. “This will be a fun, festive, thought provoking book, which will encourage all to see what is possible when we unite in defense of our faith and ignore the politically correct Scrooges who would rather take Christ out of Christmas.”
Christmas books are like Christmas albums: They are not things you make and announce in March when your career is going anywhere good. Scotty McCreery has a Christmas album. So does William Hung. They are the sort of thing that you emerge with when you are so famished for publicity that releasing a CD titled “Hung For The Holidays” seems like a palatable alternative. This isn’t to say that currently successful artists don’t release Christmas material, but they release them in, say, November, and they have — well, other projects to talk about.
But a War on Christmas book?
I know it’s March and the War on Christmas seems far away, but I just took down my War on Christmas Tree a week ago, so I think we can shoehorn it in.
The War on Christmas is like alien spacecraft and true love — it is one of those things that seems to be visible only to people who already believe in it. The rest of us are baffled. Who are these people who think there’s a war on Christmas and Christmas isn’t winning? Have they ever visited a Starbucks?
I have to take issue with the title. A Happy Holiday isn’t necessarily a Merry Christmas. Sometimes, you just wished someone a pleasant Hanukkah!
I was hoping the book would be aimed at children and would be some sort of variation on How The Secular Grinches Stole “Christ” Out of Christmas. But, alas, it apparently isn’t.
“Why are you taking my Christmas tree, why?” Cindy Lou Palin-Who? would ask, looking sad, and the Grinch would reply that it was because Harry Reid had given him specific instructions to do so and that later he was going to come back with first lady Michelle Obama, take away Cindy Lou’s candy canes and force her to do jumping jacks. The one bright spot in an otherwise bleak story would be Cindy Lou’s discovery of Clean Coal in her stocking. Everything would end with the Whos holding hands and feeling benevolent toward all men (except the Whos outside the circle who did not celebrate Christmas and found this whole thing kind of awkward.) I could picture it being very heartwarming. I would read all the copies of it you put in front of me. Heck, if she doesn’t use this idea, I might pitch it myself. Or at the very least, rework it for my Put Thor Back In Thursday campaign.
Still, what an odd reminder of how much has changed since 2008. Sarah Palin is gone and Tina Fey is still here, active, beloved, hosting the Golden Globes. It turned out she had one vital advantage over Sarah Palin, career-wise — she could stop being Sarah Palin whenever she wanted to.
(Oh, who am I kidding, it’ll probably sell.)