Which is a clever reversal of a very well-documented reality.
Newspaper receives wave of criticism over claim that Energy secretary nominee didn't know about key functions
Letter cites conflict of interest at firm.
Perhaps it's because of the whole no-proof-whatsoever thing.
Just a technical glitch.
They provide a bland response to a detailed timeline and questions, then proceed to complain about omissions.
The media outlet wants reporters working on big stories with impact, not small stuff.
A good bet would be no.
Just what that means, we do not know.
Networks trade voices back and forth.