The Washington Post

Charge: Media ‘rigging’ presidential election

(Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg)

Herewith another installment of Mediology, which looks at the collision course between the media and the country’s right-left divide.


Brent Bozell and his Media Research Center have taken to the envelope in their attack on the so-called liberal media. Bozell and a crowd of co-signatories have drafted a letter targeting outlets of the mainstream media for their coverage of the Obama-Romney contest. Here’s how it gets started:

This election year, so much of the broadcast networks, their cable counterparts, and the major establishment print media are out of control with a deliberate and unmistakable leftist agenda. To put it bluntly: you are rigging this election and taking sides in order to pre-determine the outcome. In the quarter century since the Media Research Center was established to document liberal media bias, there has never been a more brazen and complete attempt by the liberal so-called “news” media to decide the outcome of an election.

The letter recites eight counts of alleged malpractice, including:

*Painting conservative ideas as extreme, while refusing to report the disastrous consequences of liberal programs enacted since 2008.

*Submerging the truly horrendous economic conditions America is facing and focusing only on minor political issues.

The letter carries more than 20 co-signers, including Rush Limbaugh, Tony Perkins and Laura Ingraham. An inquiry to the Media Research Center asking whether any big-name conservatives declined to sign on hasn’t scored a response. Intended recipients are the big three network news operations and CNN.

Bozell & Co.’s letter marks the second time in two days that we’ve chronicled charges that the media in the 2012 election has reached a new peak of biased corruption. Yet neither undertakes an analysis of media conduct in previous election cycles, an element that would help buttress the worse-than-ever slam.


*Media Matters for America is crusading against the Wall Street Journal for failing to issue key disclosures in op-ed pieces. The latest omission, it charges, relates to a piece written by former Bush attorney general Michael Mukasey. The problem is that Mukasey is a Romney campaign adviser and there’s no mention of such.

The Journal did not disclose Mukasey’s position as a Romney campaign adviser. This fits with the Journal’s practice of repeatedly publishing columns by Karl Rove without disclosure of his role as head of pro-Republican groups dedicated to defeating President Obama. The paper has also published op-eds by nine Romney campaign advisers without disclosure of their roles.

Even though readers of the Wall Street Journal’s editorial page entertain no illusions about its worldview, disclosures are a central part of an op-ed operation — especially in light of the vast and conflict-heavy web of pundits out there. Policing the omissions is a somewhat thankless and low-profile proposition.

Erik Wemple writes the Erik Wemple blog, where he reports and opines on media organizations of all sorts.


Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read


Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
How to make Sean Brock's 'Heritage' cornbread
New limbs for Pakistani soldiers
The signature dish of Charleston, S.C.
Play Videos
Why seasonal allergies make you miserable
John Lewis, 'Marv the Barb' and the politics of barber shops
What you need to know about filming the police
Play Videos
The Post taste tests Pizza Hut's new hot dog pizza
5 tips for using your thermostat
Michael Bolton's cinematic serenade to Detroit
Play Videos
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
The signature drink of New Orleans