And that seems to have triggered a reaction among students. As the AP’s Justin Pope finds, students are borrowing less--taking out just $8 billion in private loans last year, compared with $24 billion in 2007-08. Since private borrowing tends to be more expensive, that’s potentially good news. Overall borrowing is down on per-student basis too, according to College Board numbers out last month.
For those who have taken out loans, it’s not a completely gloomy picture either. Students who borrow are more likely to attend college full-time, which correlates with a much higher graduation rate. More from Pope:
What’s the upside of borrowing? Federal data...shows roughly 86 percent of students who borrow for college are able to attend full-time, compared to 70 percent of students who don’t borrow. That matters because roughly 60 percent of full-time students receive a bachelor’s degree within eight years, compared to 25 percent of part-time students.
As the student debt burden has risen, the rate of college completion has steadily increased. The percent of students who receive a bachelor’s degree within six years of college enrollment has increased from 52.2 percent in 1997 to 55.5 percent in 2009, according to the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. It’s a relatively intuitive conclusion that often gets lost: As student borrowing has increased, so has the rate of students completing their degrees in higher education.