The Washington Post

VA and DoD’s reversal on electronic health records criticized

The decision this month by the departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs to scrap plans to create a single electronic health record came under renewed attack Wednesday on Capitol Hill as the Government Accountability Office questioned the departments’ assertion that the action will enable them to deliver improved health care more quickly and for less money.

Former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki announced this month that the departments would not create a single electronic health records system. (Department of Defense)

Valerie C Melvin, director of information management and technology resources issues for the GAO, told the House Veterans Affairs Committee on   Wednesday that “longstanding institutional deficiencies”  have not been addressed by the departments and could stand in the way of their attempts to create a seamless health-care system.

.A GAO statement prepared for the hearing said the “patchwork efforts” of the departments over the last 15 years have been plagued by poor planning, inadequate accountability and poor oversight.

VA Secretary Eric Shinseki and then-Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta announced Feb. 5 that they would scrap a long-touted plan to create a single system, and said it would be faster and cheaper to integrate existing systems.

The announcement outraged members of Congress from both parties as well as veterans groups, who have accused the departments of squandering progress and wasting money.

“Sadly, four years and a billion dollars later, veterans are left with the feeling their government is throwing in the towel,” American Legion representative Jacob Gadd told the committee.

“I find it hard to think of another description than ‘down the drain’ for funding that may have produced little result, the same funding that could have gone toward taking care of active and former service members,” Rep. Jeff Miller (R-Fla.,) chairman of the committee, said during Wednesday’s hearing.

Rep. Mike Michaud (D-Maine), the ranking Democrat on the committee, said he was “disheartened” by the decision. “I’m sure everyone in here would agree that we cannot afford to continue moving forward and back on this issue,” he said.

Representatives from the VA and Pentagon insisted that the use of shared data, applications and user interface will allow “quick wins” that will improve health care.

“Some have interpreted this shift in strategy as backing away from our commitment to achieve an integrated electronic health record,” Defense Department representatives said in their prepared testimony. “Nothing could be further from the truth.”



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
Unconventional warfare with a side of ale
It's in the details: Five ways to enhance your kitchen makeover
Play Videos
Drawing as an act of defiance
A fighter pilot helmet with 360 degrees of sky
Border collies: A 'mouse trap' for geese on the National Mall
Play Videos
Bao: The signature dish of San Francisco
This man's job is binge-watching for Netflix
What you need to know about Planned Parenthood
Play Videos
How to save and spend money at college
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
Europe's migrant crisis, explained
Next Story
Josh Hicks · February 27, 2013

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.