The Washington Post

Labor Department: No double dipping for furloughed feds

Federal workers who were furloughed during the government shutdown will not be allowed to collect unemployment benefits in addition to the back pay they are due under the deal that ended the temporary closure.

The Labor Department said last week that all states must recoup any unemployment payments that went to federal employees forced off the job during the 16-day lapse in operational funding.

Federal employees protest the sequester outside the Department of Labor on March 20. (Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg). Federal employees protest the sequester outside the Department of Labor on March 20. (Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg).

More than 800,000 federal workers were furloughed at the start of the shutdown, although that number dropped by roughly half after the Pentagon ordered most of its civilian personnel back to work partway through the closure.

Republicans, including House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.), issued a letter this month to the Obama administration asking that employees not be allowed to receive unemployment benefits on top of their retroactive furlough compensation.

Concerns about “double dipping” arose from ambiguity in an earlier Labor Department document that suggested some states wouldn’t necessarily have to recoup unemployment payments from federal workers who receive back pay. On a Q&A page, the agency said states would “generally require” repayment.

The Oregon Employment Department, which administers unemployment benefits for the state of Oregon, initially said its administrative rules prevented the agency from recouping payments from furloughed federal workers who receive retroactive compensation.

The Labor Department clarified its guidelines last Thursday, saying federal employees furloughed during the shutdown do not meet the definition of “unemployed” and are therefore not eligible for unemployment insurance benefits.

“States must now take appropriate action to address the return of unemployment benefits already distributed,” said Labor spokesman Jason Kuruvilla.

Oregon has subsequently changed its policy and has advised those who applied for payments to cancel their claims or return the money once they receive notification.

Follow Josh Hicks on TwitterFacebook, or Google+. Connect by e-mail at  josh.hicks@washpost.comVisit The Federal Eye, The Fed Page and Post Politics for more federal news. E-mail with news tips and other suggestions.

Josh Hicks covers Maryland politics and government. He previously anchored the Post’s Federal Eye blog, focusing on federal accountability and workforce issues.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
Unconventional warfare with a side of ale
It's in the details: Five ways to enhance your kitchen makeover
Play Videos
Drawing as an act of defiance
A fighter pilot helmet with 360 degrees of sky
Border collies: A 'mouse trap' for geese on the National Mall
Play Videos
Bao: The signature dish of San Francisco
This man's job is binge-watching for Netflix
What you need to know about Planned Parenthood
Play Videos
How to save and spend money at college
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
Europe's migrant crisis, explained
Next Story
Lisa Rein · October 28, 2013

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.