The Washington Post

GOP lawmaker proposes ‘Keep Your Health Plan’ bill

A top House Republican has proposed legislation that would allow the continued use of health plans that existed before January 2013, regardless of whether the coverage meets Affordable Care Act standards.

The move comes as a growing number of Americans are complaining about losing their insurance or facing higher premiums because of the law, in addition to ongoing troubles with the online health exchange where individuals can purchase new coverage.

Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich), chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. (Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg). Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich), chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. (Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg)

House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.) introduced the bill, which would extend the date for plans that are “grandfathered,” or not required to follow the stricter guidelines under President Obama’s signature health-care legislation.

Currently, only plans offered up until the date when “Obamacare” became law in March 2010 are allowed to remain on the marketplace without meeting the new coverage rules.

Under the president’s health-care legislation, all individuals must obtain health insurance by the end of March to avoid paying a penalty.

Upton said in an editorial for USA Today that his bill, titled the Keep Your Health Plan Act, would provide a “voluntary escape hatch” for Americans who want to maintain their existing coverage.

“Implementation of the president’s health-care law has generated confusion and concern,” the congressman wrote. “That’s not what health reform should be about. Americans deserve to know that in times of need, they will have the coverage and care that they want, need and can afford.”

Health reporter Sarah Kliff explained in a recent Wonkblog article that many plans in existence prior to the grandfather deadline have been altered and will not qualify for an exemption to the new standards of the health-care law. That’s because insurance companies often tweak their plans, making changes to cost-sharing or the benefits they offer.

This raises questions about how effective Upton’s proposal would be in the long-run. It could buy time for some individuals, but their plans would still be likely to change over time and no longer qualify for the grandfather rule.

Follow Josh Hicks on TwitterFacebook or Google+. Connect by e-mail at  josh.hicks@washpost.comVisit The Federal Eye, The Fed Page and Post Politics for more federal news. E-mail with news tips and other suggestions.

Josh Hicks covers Maryland politics and government. He previously anchored the Post’s Federal Eye blog, focusing on federal accountability and workforce issues.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
In defense of dads
Don’t be ‘that’ sports parent | On Parenting
Why seasonal allergies make you miserable
Play Videos
The most interesting woman you've never heard of
Urban Blight: Philadelphia’s promising fix
How to keep your child safe in the water
Play Videos
What you need to know about trans fats
5 tips for using your thermostat
What's fishy about fish oil
Play Videos
How to get organized for back to school
The drug war had its own board game. Yes, really.
If you oppose Black Lives Matter, you would've abhorred Martin Luther King
Next Story
Josh Hicks · November 4, 2013

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.