The Washington Post

Survey: Strong concern about health coverage among congressional staffers

The vast majority of congressional staff directors think their employees are worried about their health benefits after a GOP amendment to the Affordable Care Act forced them off their normal federal-worker plans, according to a survey released Monday.

(J. Scott Applewhite/AP) (J. Scott Applewhite/AP)

Ninety percent of chiefs of staff and local directors in a Congressional Management Foundation survey said their employees are concerned about the benefit changes, while 86 percent said their workers are worried about cost.

Congressional staffers previously qualified for coverage under the Federal Employee Health Benefits Plan, but an amendment by Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) to the health law now prohibits lawmakers and their staffers from taking part in the program.

Those individuals must now seek coverage through their spouses, parents, or the federal exchange established under the health law. Otherwise, they have to pay a penalty for not having insurance.

Grassley pitched the amendment in 2009 as a way to prevent lawmakers from exempting themselves and their staffers from the effects of the law, which he correctly anticipated would cause many Americans to lose their existing coverage.

One thing to keep in mind: The Affordable Care Act expressly prohibits congressional employees from using their previous insurance plans, but that same rule does not apply to other Americans. Instead, the law simply sets a minimum standard of coverage that some old plans did not meet, thereby forcing certain individuals to find more robust plans.

It’s also important to note that the federal-employee health insurance plan meets the standards of the health law. So, without the Grassley amendment, lawmakers and their staffs could have continued their existing coverage, just like millions of other Americans whose plans meet the requirements.

Fifteen percent of congressional chiefs of staff and local directors responded to the survey, which took place between Nov. 18 and Dec. 6, before the benefits changes took effect on Jan. 1.

The survey also found that 38 percent of chiefs of staff and local directors feel their employees are likely to look for a job outside their current congressional office within the next 12 months, representing an 8-percent increase compared to 2011.

Follow Josh Hicks on TwitterFacebook or Google+. Connect by e-mail at  josh.hicks@washpost.comVisit The Federal Eye, The Fed Page and Post Politics for more federal news. E-mail with news tips and other suggestions.

Josh Hicks covers Maryland politics and government. He previously anchored the Post’s Federal Eye blog, focusing on federal accountability and workforce issues.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
Unconventional warfare with a side of ale
It's in the details: Five ways to enhance your kitchen makeover
Play Videos
Drawing as an act of defiance
A fighter pilot helmet with 360 degrees of sky
Border collies: A 'mouse trap' for geese on the National Mall
Play Videos
Bao: The signature dish of San Francisco
This man's job is binge-watching for Netflix
What you need to know about Planned Parenthood
Play Videos
How to save and spend money at college
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
Europe's migrant crisis, explained
Next Story
Joe Davidson · January 13, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.