The Washington Post

State campaign contribution limits could be on the line today at the Supreme Court


Citizens United President David Bossie, right, meets with reporters outside the Supreme Court in 2010 after the court ruled on that case. (Lauren Victoria Burke/AP)

The Supreme Court today is scheduled to hear oral arguments in a case about campaign contribution limits that could end up having implications for some state regulations.

The case itself — McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission — is all about federal rules. McCutcheon, an Alabama businessman and GOP donor, wants the federal government to remove a limit of $123,200 on overall contributions an individual can make in a two-year cycle. (FEC rules also limit individual contributions to candidates, party committees and political action committees, all subject to the aggregate limit.)

If McCutcheon and the Republican National Committee, who together filed the case, get their way, individuals would potentially be able to donate millions of dollars per cycle. They say the limit is a violation of free speech rights. Supporters argue it maintains a level playing field and helps to prevent corruption.

A ruling would affect a small group — only 646 individuals bumped up against that aggregate limit during the 2012 election cycle, according to the Center for Responsive Politics’ Open Secrets blog.

But state laws with lower limits may hang in the balance, too. That’s because the rationale that upholds or dismantles the aggregate limit may end up applying to those limits, too. And roughly 10 states have such rules, experts say.

In Massachusetts, for example, the maximum an individual can contribute to all state, county and local candidates is $12,500. In the next election cycle, Arizonans will be limited to $6,390 in contributions to candidates or committees that give to candidates.

Opponents of aggregate limits argue that states without caps are doing just fine. But proponents compare it to the Citizens United case that allowed unlimited independent corporate political spending. That case had implications for 22 states with similar rules, according to the advocacy group Public Citizen. And some argue that the outcome of McCutcheon could be more significant.

“As bad as Citizens United was, I think this would be much worse,” Jennifer Bevan-Dangel, Maryland executive director of Common Cause, a nonprofit active on campaign-finance issues, said in an interview a few weeks ago.

Either way, today’s oral arguments are just the start. But experts and advocacy groups will be closely watching for a sense of how the court will rule next year.

(To learn more about the McCutcheon case, check out our Supreme Court reporter Robert Barnes’s excellent explainer.

The Supreme Court is hearing Shaun McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, a case that could roll back campaign finance restrictions to those before the Watergate era. (Thomas LeGro/The Washington Post)

Niraj Chokshi is a general assignment reporter for The Washington Post.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
New Hampshire has voted. The Democrats debate on Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Philip Rucker and Robert Costa say...
For Trump, the victory here was sweet vindication, showing that his atypical campaign could prevail largely on the power of celebrity and saturation media coverage. But there was also potential for concern in Tuesday's outcome. Trump faces doubts about his discipline as a candidate and whether he can build his support beyond the levels he has shown in the polls.
The Post's John Wagner and Anne Gearan say...
Hillary Clinton, who was declared the winner of the Iowa caucuses last week by the narrowest of margins, now finds herself struggling to right her once-formidable campaign against a self-described democratic socialist whom she has accused of selling pipe dreams to his supporters.
Quoted
People have every right to be angry. But they're also hungry for solutions.
Hillary Clinton, in her New Hampshire primary night speech
Quoted
I am going to be the greatest jobs president that God ever created.
Donald Trump, in his New Hampshire primary victory speech
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
See results from N.H.
Most Read

politics

govbeat

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.