The Washington Post

At a time of surpluses elsewhere, Pennsylvania faces deficit

Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett (R) delivers his budget address for the 2014-15 fiscal year to a joint session of the state legislature on Feb. 4, in Harrisburg, as state House Speaker Sam Smith, (R-Jefferson), left, and Lt. Gov. Jim Cawley (R) listen from behind him. (Matt Rourke/AP)

After years of harsh budget cuts, the economic recovery has meant good news for states reaping the benefits of rebounding tax revenue. California has a $4.2 billion surplus. New York has $2 billion in extra cash. Across the country, state revenue is up 3.8 percent over last year, according to the National Association of State Budget Officials.

But in Pennsylvania, the picture isn’t as rosy. As he seeks reelection this year, Gov. Tom Corbett (R) is dealing with a budget deficit of more than $1 billion. So why, when other states are rolling in dough, is Pennsylvania still drowning in red ink?

Corbett’s critics say tax cuts the governor pushed through the Republican-dominated legislature are to blame. In 2011, Corbett backed cuts to the state’s capital stock and franchise tax that cost the state almost $600 million a year.

The state also made changes to its bank shares tax, which, though billed as revenue-neutral, has cost about $25 million. That’s a small amount on its face, but over time, that money adds up. All told, Corbett has signed legislation cutting taxes on businesses by about $1.2 billion since taking office.

The state’s tax structure isn’t suited to the kind of recovery the country is experiencing, either. Pennsylvania has a flat income tax, meaning someone making $1 million a year pays the same percentage as someone making $100,000, or $50,000. When the wealthy made more money in California, they paid more in taxes, because of the graduated tax rate; not so in Pennsylvania.

“The income growth in Pennsylvania, like the rest of the country, has been at the top. So over time, we’re at a disadvantage,” said Sharon Ward, director of the Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center, a left-leaning think tank.

Corbett has proposed more tax cuts. The governor’s 2013-2014 budget proposal includes a reduction in the state’s corporate net income tax from 9.99 percent to 6.99 percent, to be phased in over a 10-year period. That could cost the state north of $770 million per year, based on current tax collections, the Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center reported. Corbett also called for a phase-out of the capital stock and franchise tax.

Corbett campaigned on a no-new-taxes pledge, and he’s stuck to that. If he continues to do so, it means more cuts in the future.

Corbett’s administration places the blame squarely on his predecessor, Democrat Ed Rendell. Corbett entered office in 2011 facing a $4.2 billion deficit, a hole from which the state is still recovering.

“I don’t know that we missed the trend. Because of the prior administration, the governor came into office well behind the starting line,” state budget director Charles Zogby told the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. “They not only cleaned out the cupboards bare, they took the cupboards too.”

Rendell’s office disputes that charge, pointing to $1 billion in funds that carried over from his last budget to Corbett’s first. State revenue in 2011 was up $1.5 billion over the previous year, rebounding to nearly pre-recession levels.

Whatever is to blame, the bottom line remains: Most states are finally reversing the painful trends of the recession. Pennsylvania hasn’t fully recovered. Corbett’s reelection bid may suffer because of that fact.

Reid Wilson covers national politics and Congress for The Washington Post. He is the author of Read In, The Post’s morning tip sheet on politics.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
New Hampshire has voted. The Democrats debate on Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Philip Rucker and Robert Costa say...
For Trump, the victory here was sweet vindication, showing that his atypical campaign could prevail largely on the power of celebrity and saturation media coverage. But there was also potential for concern in Tuesday's outcome. Trump faces doubts about his discipline as a candidate and whether he can build his support beyond the levels he has shown in the polls.
The Post's John Wagner and Anne Gearan say...
Hillary Clinton, who was declared the winner of the Iowa caucuses last week by the narrowest of margins, now finds herself struggling to right her once-formidable campaign against a self-described democratic socialist whom she has accused of selling pipe dreams to his supporters.
People have every right to be angry. But they're also hungry for solutions.
Hillary Clinton, in her New Hampshire primary night speech
I am going to be the greatest jobs president that God ever created.
Donald Trump, in his New Hampshire primary victory speech
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
See results from N.H.

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.