The Washington Post

Obama budget would change wildfire fighting formula

A wildfire burns in the hills just north of the San Gabriel Valley community of Glendora, Calif., on Thursday, Jan. 16, 2014. (Nick Ut/AP)
A wildfire burns in the hills just north of the San Gabriel Valley community of Glendora, Calif., on Thursday, Jan. 16, 2014. (Nick Ut/AP)

With the cost of wildfire suppression rising, President Obama told governors of some of the hardest hit states on Monday he will ask Congress to change the way the federal government pays for disaster response to the most severe fires.

At a meeting at the White House, Obama told governors his proposed budget, due out March 4, will include a measure to allow the Departments of Interior and Agriculture to tap a special disaster relief account when the costs of fighting wildfires exceeds their annual budgets.

The White House backs proposed legislation sponsored by Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) and Reps. Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.) and Mike Simpson (R-Idaho) that would treat the most severe fires as extraordinary costs. Money to fight those fires would come from a Wildfire Suppression Cap Adjustment that would not be subject to discretionary budget caps, a White House official said in an e-mail.

The new account would only be used to fight the most extreme catastrophic fires, such as those that require an emergency response or threaten urban areas. Congress would still be asked to appropriate money for fire suppression, but in recent years fire costs have exceeded those budgets; the new proposal would allow fire fighting agencies to combat wildfires without taking money from accounts dedicated to other forest activity.

In 2012 and 2013, the White House said, Agriculture and Interior transferred more than $1 billion from accounts covering other programs to fight wildfires. In many cases, the money came out of budgets aimed at reducing future wildfires, like brush disposal and forest management.

In recent years, the most extreme 1 percent of all wildfires have consumed 30 percent of total fire suppression budgets. The government has spent about $1.4 billion per year over the last 10 years fighting fires. The Rim Fire, which burned hundreds of thousands of acres near Yosemite National Park in California last year, cost more than $100 million alone.

In the meeting with governors of Arizona, Oklahoma, Utah, Colorado, Oregon, Washington, Wyoming and Nevada, Obama and several senior Cabinet officials said they would support Western states grappling with the increased severity and cost of fire suppression.

The changing climate has intensified wildfires in Western states in recent years. A three-year long drought has also heightened the risk, especially in states like California, where the average snowpack this year remains far below historical averages.

Rising temperatures have aided invasive pests like the mountain pine beetle in the Pacific Northwest and the goldspotted oak borer in Southern California, which turn living trees that could survive a fire into dead, dry, 20-foot tall matchsticks. Scientists hope this winter’s freezing temperatures have temporarily stemmed the spread of those bugs, though there is no way to be certain.

Human settlement is contributing to the danger. As suburban and exurban communities move into the Wildland Urban Interface, more wildfires are threatening man-made structures — which means state, federal and local agencies are having to deploy fire fighters on a more frequent basis.

In the past, “it was rare that you would have to deal with fire and structures,” said Randy Eardley, a spokesman for the Bureau of Land Management. “Nowadays, it’s the opposite. It’s rare to have a fire that doesn’t involve structures.”

Reid Wilson covers national politics and Congress for The Washington Post. He is the author of Read In, The Post’s morning tip sheet on politics.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The New Hampshire primary is Tuesday. Get caught up on the race.
New Hampshire primary: What to expect
New Hampshire will hold a traditional primary just eight days after the Iowa caucuses. Polling in the Granite state has historically been volatile in the final weeks before the primary. After the Iowa caucuses, many New Hampshire voters cement their opinions.
The Post's Ed O'Keefe says ...
Something has clicked for Bush in New Hampshire in the past few days. What has transpired by no means guarantees him a top-tier finish in Tuesday’s Republican primary here, but the crowds turning out to see him are bigger, his delivery on the stump is crisper and some of his key rivals have stumbled. At the least, the developments have mostly silenced talk of a hasty exit and skittish donors.
The feminist appeal may not be working for Clinton
In New Hampshire, Sen. Bernie Sanders is beating Clinton among women by eight percentage points, according to a new CNN-WMUR survey. This represents a big shift from the results last week in the Iowa caucuses, where Clinton won women by 11 points.
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the next state to vote, but Marco Rubio has recently seen a jump in his support, according to polls.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont. She left the state Sunday to go to Flint, Mich., where a cost-saving decision led to poisonous levels of lead in the water of the poor, heavily black, rust-belt city. 
55% 40%
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.