The Washington Post

Federal judge will require Ohio to recognize out-of-state same-sex marriages

provided by the Cincinnati Bar Association, federal Judge Timothy Black accepts an award from the bar for his involvement in the community. Black on Friday, April 4, 2014 said he will strike down Ohio's voter-approved ban on gay marriage, meaning the state must recognize marriages of gay couples who legally wed elsewhere. Black made the statement following final arguments in a lawsuit that challenged the constitutionality of the marriage ban. (AP Photo/Cincinnati Bar Association, File)
File: U.S. District Court Judge Timothy Black  (AP Photo/Cincinnati Bar Association, File)

A federal judge said Friday he would issue a ruling requiring Ohio to recognize all same-sex marriages performed in other states.

U.S. District Court Judge Timothy Black’s decision in the Henry v. Wymyslo  case comes about nine months after he ruled that Ohio must recognize a gay couple’s marriage in Maryland, where same-sex marriage is legal, on the death certificate of one of the partners.

Lawyers for a number of same-sex couples expanded their original request to cover all marriages performed in states that allow same-sex unions. On Friday, Black said from the bench that his forthcoming order would rule unconstitutional Ohio’s ban on recognizing legal same-sex marriages from other states.

Black said he will issue his ruling on April 14, giving the state time to prepare an appeal; the order will not take effect until it is issued in written form. Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine told WVXU Radio he would appeal to the Sixth Circuit.

“It’s going to make a real difference in the lives of couples who are legally married and deserve to be treated as what they are,” said Evan Wolfson, president of the pro-same-sex marriage group Freedom to Marry. “The federal government treats those couples as equal in terms of federal programs, but Ohio continues to discriminate, and that must end.”

The ruling will not require Ohio to perform same-sex marriages inside its own borders.

It’s the latest victory for advocates of same-sex marriage ten months after the Supreme Court held that the federal government had to treat homosexual unions as they would heterosexual marriages. That case, United States v. Windsor, found a section of the federal Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional. Black’s original ruling requiring Ohio to comply with federal rules came a month after the Windsor decision.

Ohio banned same-sex marriages and civil unions in 2004, when voters passed a constitutional amendment with 62 percent of the vote.

Reid Wilson covers national politics and Congress for The Washington Post. He is the author of Read In, The Post’s morning tip sheet on politics.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Be a man and cry
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
Sleep advice you won't find in baby books
Play Videos
Drawing as an act of defiance
A flood of refugees from Syria but only a trickle to America
Chicago's tacos, four ways
Play Videos
What you need to know about filming the police
What you need to know about trans fats
Syrian refugee: 'I’m committed to the power of music'
Play Videos
Riding the X2 with D.C.'s most famous rapper
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
Europe's migrant crisis, explained
Next Story
Niraj Chokshi · April 4, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.