The Washington Post

Map: 22 states have passed new voting restrictions over the past four years

(Brennan Center)

Nearly half the nation has tighter voting restrictions today than four years ago.

Since the 2010 election, 22 states have passed new voting requirements, according to the nonprofit law and policy institute the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University, which advocates against many of the restrictions. In 15 of those states, this year marks the first major federal election with those new policies in place. Seven states are facing court challenges over their tighter voting laws.

The restrictions have a disproportionate impact on the black population, according to a review of census data. While the 22 states are home to 46 percent of the overall population, they represent 57 percent of the nation’s black population. The Hispanic population, however, is underrepresented: just 42 percent live in the states with new voting requirements. The restrictions range from photo ID requirements to narrower windows for early voting.

Most were passed by GOP-led legislatures in states with growing minority turnout, the report finds. In 18 of the 22 states, the restrictions were ushered through GOP-led bodies. The requirements will also have an outsized effect on states with high minority turnout. Seven of the states with new requirements are among the 11 with the highest African American turnout in 2008. Nine of the states with new restrictions are among the 12 with the highest Hispanic turnout.

Proponents of such policies say they boost election integrity and reduce voter fraud. Opponents argue that they discourage turnout. Academic studies have found that voter fraud is incredibly rare and are mixed on the impact such policies have on turnout.

The Brennan Center report characterizes the recent passage of voter requirements as a marked shift. Between early 2011 and the 2012 election, state lawmakers introduced at least 180 restrictive voting bills in 41 states, with such policies passing in 19 states by the 2012 election. Laws requiring that voters present some form of ID at the polls are in effect in 31 states, according to a count last month by the bipartisan National Conference on State Legislatures.

The report breaks the new requirements into four broad categories: tighter identification laws introduced in 13 states; greater registration requirements introduced in 10 states; narrower early voting windows in 8 states; and restricting the voting rights of those with past convictions in 3 states. (Some states passed multiple new requirements.)

The 7 states facing court challenges

(Brennan Center)

The seven states facing challenges over their new voting requirements are Arizona, Arkansas, Kansas, North Carolina, Ohio, Texas and Wisconsin, as shown in the map above. (Iowa is shaded a different color because, while there is a lawsuit there, it targets an administrative action and not a law.)

The 16 states that passed expansions to voter access since 2012

Expansions will be in effect this fall for the darker-shaded states. (Brennan Center)

Of the 16 states that have passed expansions to voting access in the past two years, 11 modernized their registration systems, making it easier for eligible citizens to sign up. Early voting was expanded in three states, while youths in their late teens were granted the ability to pre-register to vote in another three. Oklahoma weakened its photo ID law. Colorado expanded ballot access to non-English speakers, while Mississippi and Oklahoma expanded absentee ballot access.

Niraj Chokshi is a general assignment reporter for The Washington Post.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The Democrats debate Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The big questions after New Hampshire, from The Post's Dan Balz
Can Bernie Sanders cut into Hillary Clinton's strength in the minority community and turn his challenge into a genuine threat? And can any of the Republicans consolidate anti-Trump sentiment in the party in time to stop the billionaire developer and reality-TV star, whose unorthodox, nationalistic campaign has shaken the foundations of American politics?
Clinton in New Hampshire: 2008 vs. 2015
Hillary Clinton did about as well in N.H. this year as she did in 2008, percentage-wise. In the state's main counties, Clinton performed on average only about two percentage points worse than she did eight years ago (according to vote totals as of Wednesday morning) -- and in five of the 10 counties, she did as well or better.
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.