The bill, which is aimed at making the notoriously laborious chamber more efficient by reducing the number of presidential appointees requiring a Senate vote, cleared the Senate back in July. Since then, it’s been languishing in the House.
And now, we’re hearing that the bill might never see the light of day.
The subject of confirmations has turned toxic on Capitol Hill, where Republicans in both chambers are smarting from Obama’s end-run around Senate Republicans’ gambit to keep the president from making recess appointments by technically keeping the chamber in session — even though the “sessions” lasted mere seconds each day.
“The president pretty much poisoned the well on the whole subject matter,” says one Republican staffer. “If you bring that bill up now, you’d get a big fight.”
Advocates for the bill were hoping for smoother sailing. They anticipated the House would simply pass the bill in deference to the Senate — since Senate GOP leaders backed it, and because it deals solely with the business of “the upper chamber.”
“This should be the Senate’s prerogative, and we would hope that the House would defer to that judgement,” says Max Stier, president of the Partnership for Public Service, a bipartisan good-government group.
While that might — might — have been the case just a few weeks ago, it’s certainly not now.
It’s a new ball game.