The Washington Post

Obama judges confirm numbers way up in ‘post-nuclear’ world

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) talks to reporters after the weekly Senate Democratic Policy Luncheon at the U.S. Capitol on May 20. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s triggering of the “nuclear option” on Nov. 21 — which reduced the number of votes needed to end filibusters on most nominees — has resulted in a sharp increase in the number of Obama-picked judges on the federal bench.

The Senate confirmed only 32 Obama nominees for district court seats in all of 2013, according to Senate data, but has already confirmed 46 in the first half of this year and is likely — even allowing for the month-long August vacation and holiday recesses in November and December — to easily double the 2013 total.

Obama, at this point, has already put 270 judges on the federal bench (not counting the Supreme Court), according to a count by the Alliance for Justice. He’s appointed 49 to appellate courts so far (compared to 45 for Bush at this point and 43 for Clinton) and 221 to district courts (compared to 224 for Clinton and 203 for Bush).


It’s unclear whether he’ll be able to match Clinton’s 372 lower court judges or even Bush’s total of 327. That would depend on who runs the Senate in 2015. If the Republicans re-take the Senate, judicial confirmations likely will drop to something approaching, say, zero.

So given Obama’s dismal approval ratings, if you aren’t confirmed this year, better hope you saved the receipt for that beautiful black robe you bought.




Al Kamen, an award-winning columnist on the national staff of The Washington Post, created the “In the Loop” column in 1993.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
New Hampshire has voted. The Democrats debate on Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Philip Rucker and Robert Costa say...
For Trump, the victory here was sweet vindication, showing that his atypical campaign could prevail largely on the power of celebrity and saturation media coverage. But there was also potential for concern in Tuesday's outcome. Trump faces doubts about his discipline as a candidate and whether he can build his support beyond the levels he has shown in the polls.
The Post's John Wagner and Anne Gearan say...
Hillary Clinton, who was declared the winner of the Iowa caucuses last week by the narrowest of margins, now finds herself struggling to right her once-formidable campaign against a self-described democratic socialist whom she has accused of selling pipe dreams to his supporters.
People have every right to be angry. But they're also hungry for solutions.
Hillary Clinton, in her New Hampshire primary night speech
I am going to be the greatest jobs president that God ever created.
Donald Trump, in his New Hampshire primary victory speech
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
See results from N.H.

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.