The Washington Post

Who knew Afghans don’t like soybeans?

Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction John Sopko at soybean factory in Mazar-e Shari, Afghanistan. (Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction report, via Flickr)

Technically, this is not news — in that it sadly happens all too frequently — but the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction issued a report Thursday slamming a $34.4 million Agriculture Department aid program Afghanistan for trying to “create a market for soybean products” when “Afghans apparently have never grown or eaten soybeans before.”

The report faulted Agriculture for not having its contractor, the American Soybean Association (ASA), “conduct feasibility . . . studies” before starting the project in 2010.

Seems the British international aid agency had conducted “scientific research” between 2005 and 2008, the report  noted, and “concluded that soybeans were inappropriate for conditions and farming practices in northern Afghanistan, where the program was implemented by ASA.”

Even so, Agriculture shelled out $34.4 million in “commodities, transportation and administrative funds to ASA” for the project, but production “has not met expectations and there are doubts” about the “sustainability” of a processing factory that had been built.

Agriculture, in response, noted numerous “challenges,” to the project, including “insecurity in the region” — apparently a reference to those Taliban folks — “that affected production results.”

In addition, “farmers remained reluctant to switch to soybean production” despite efforts by the Afghan government and others. But Agriculture is modifying the program “to incorporate lessons learned,” shifting resources and taking other steps to increase production.

Better move quickly since the program is ending pretty soon.

For more on why this report isn’t news, see the first chapter of our pal Rajiv Chandrasekaran’s brilliant book, “Little America,” about American aid efforts to build canals in Helmand province.


Al Kamen, an award-winning columnist on the national staff of The Washington Post, created the “In the Loop” column in 1993.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The Democrats debate Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The big questions after New Hampshire, from The Post's Dan Balz
Can Bernie Sanders cut into Hillary Clinton's strength in the minority community and turn his challenge into a genuine threat? And can any of the Republicans consolidate anti-Trump sentiment in the party in time to stop the billionaire developer and reality-TV star, whose unorthodox, nationalistic campaign has shaken the foundations of American politics?
Clinton in New Hampshire: 2008 vs. 2015
Hillary Clinton did about as well in N.H. this year as she did in 2008, percentage-wise. In the state's main counties, Clinton performed on average only about two percentage points worse than she did eight years ago (according to vote totals as of Wednesday morning) -- and in five of the 10 counties, she did as well or better.
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.