Jim Graham’s lawyers ask his D.C. Council colleagues to consider how they would like to be treated themselves. (Sarah L. Voisin/The Washington Post)

Now that Jim Graham’s fate lies with his D.C. Council colleagues rather than the Board of Ethics and Government Accountability, his lawyers have switched from legal arguments to political ones. In a letter to the Post, William W. Taylor III and Rachel F. Cotton characterize Graham’s actions as telling a businessman “that he did not think his record justified multiple public contracts.” Council members considering reprimand or censure, the lawyers say, “should ask themselves whether they have ever done anything similar or worse” and “begin by asking the simple question, ‘Do Jim Graham’s offhand words really justify the condemnation that he has endured?'”

In other news:

Meet D.C. corrections boss Thomas Faust — who, among other things, says that video visitation initiative has been a “great success” (Post)

Police union targets Phil Mendelson over handling of sexual assault stats (Examiner)

Now Robert Bobb is among the losing subcontractors complaining about hospital overhaul contract award (WaTimes)

Uber drivers behave badly, get fired (WUSA-TV)

In which Jonetta Rose Barras tags Vincent Gray as a “bona fide spendthrift” (Examiner column)

“The bottom line is, D.C. is shut down for foreclosures” (WaTimes)

All-boys charter school is set to close (Examiner)

Inside car2go’s big success in D.C. (WRC-TV)

What the zoning rewrite could mean for bike parking (WashCycle)

White Buick sought in 20-year-old’s hit-and-run death (WRC-TV)

Five townhouses at Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling damaged in fire (WUSA-TV)