The Washington Post

D.C. Council will vote Wednesday on changing primary election date

If Mendelson’s bill succeeds, voters may get an extra seven weeks to vet mayor and council candidates. (Jacquelyn Martin/Associated Press)

Three weeks after a proposal to change the date of next year’s primary election appeared to be bottled up in a D.C. Council committee, lawmakers are poised to decide the matter Wednesday.

The decision by Chairman Phil Mendelson (D) to move an emergency bill changing the election date from April 1 to June 10 sidesteps the normal legislative process. A bill introduced in April by Mendelson and Kenyan McDuffie (D-Ward 5) has been unable to move to the full council, with at least three of the five members of the Government Operations committee opposing it.

Emergency legislation is only temporarily in effect but does not have to move through a council committee. It requires a two-thirds vote of the council to pass, meaning nine members would have to support the election measure if all 13 members vote Wednesday, at the final council legislative meeting before the summer recess.

In a memorandum sent to council members and staff Friday, Mendelson cited “multiple reasons justifying this change, including: avoiding the need to campaign – including petition gathering – during the Thanksgiving and Christmas season; reducing the duration of lame duck status for retiring or defeated incumbents; increasing voter participation which is likely to  be greater in June than in April; and reducing the pro-incumbent dynamic inherent in an early primary.”

From 1974 until 2010, the District’s local primaries were held in early September. But a change in federal law meant the city had to move in 2011 to put more time between its primary and general elections in order to allow overseas voters more time to receive and return absentee ballots. Last year’s debut April primary was met with dismal candidate reviews and lagging voter participation.

Mendelson said in the memo that he has “spoken with numerous individuals and believe there is widespread support for this change in the community.” But several council members — including Muriel Bowser (D-Ward 4), who intends to appear on the ballot as a mayoral candidate — have criticized the proposal, saying it amounts to changing the rules in the middle of the game.

Mike DeBonis covers Congress and national politics for The Washington Post. He previously covered D.C. politics and government from 2007 to 2015.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
Unconventional warfare with a side of ale
It's in the details: Five ways to enhance your kitchen makeover
Play Videos
Drawing as an act of defiance
A fighter pilot helmet with 360 degrees of sky
Border collies: A 'mouse trap' for geese on the National Mall
Play Videos
Bao: The signature dish of San Francisco
This man's job is binge-watching for Netflix
What you need to know about Planned Parenthood
Play Videos
How to save and spend money at college
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
Europe's migrant crisis, explained
Next Story
Mike DeBonis · July 8, 2013

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.