The Washington Post

It’s your fault award show acceptance speeches are so long

Photo: Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images
(Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images)

Ever wonder how social scientists think about award shows like the Golden Globes? And more to the point, ever wonder why acceptance speeches go on so long, despite the fact that pretty much no one watching on TV wants to hear a long list of people — most of whom they’ve never heard of — thanked? Here’s Washington University political scientist John Patty laying out the puzzle at his blog, The Math of Politics:

Why do actors and actresses thank a whole bunch of other people when they are on TV in front of millions of viewers who hate watching actors and actresses thank a whole bunch of other people?  After all, it is arguable that awards shows are clearly and only about the viewers.  Right?

Patty’s answer is that being thanked in an award show is like a “gift”: the gift signifies more to the recipient if he or she knows that the gift giver “put a lot into that gift.” One way you can put a lot into a gift is to put thought into it, and to find something that is specifically tailored to the recipient. Another traditional way is to buy something that is more expensive, because it signals that recipient is so important to you that you are willing to pay higher cost to try to make them happy. In other words, their happiness is that much more important to you. But of course that “cost” doesn’t have to be financial.

So what does this mean for award shows? Patty explains:

The fact that the time is limited and the awardee presumably had to prepare the list of people to thank without knowing for certain that he or she would actually win merely amplifies both the cost of the “gift” of the thanks.

But, here’s the kicker: The fact that we, the audience members, hate listening to “a list of thank you’s to otherwise anonymous industry people” bolsters the value and, accordingly, the incentive for actors and actresses to do this. So, in a nutshell, it’s kind of Alanis-esque: The fact that viewers of award shows hate listening to lists of thank you’s ironically induces actors and actresses to get up on live TV and run through lists of thank you’s.

There you have it: the awards-shows-acceptance-speech-thank-you paradox! We can only hope that some day science will figure out a solution …

Joshua Tucker is a Professor of Politics at New York University. He specializes in voting, partisanship, public opinion, and protest, as well as the relationship of social media usage to all of these forms of behavior, with a focus on Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
Unconventional warfare with a side of ale
It's in the details: Five ways to enhance your kitchen makeover
Play Videos
Drawing as an act of defiance
A fighter pilot helmet with 360 degrees of sky
Border collies: A 'mouse trap' for geese on the National Mall
Play Videos
Bao: The signature dish of San Francisco
This man's job is binge-watching for Netflix
What you need to know about Planned Parenthood
Play Videos
How to save and spend money at college
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
Europe's migrant crisis, explained
Next Story
Sarah Binder · January 13, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.