The Washington Post

The midterm penalty is hurting Democrats in the Senate too

A group of visitors walks past the Senate carriage entrance on March 10, 2014 in Washington, DC. . (Photo by T.J. Kirkpatrick/Getty Images)

This is a guest post by political scientist Eric McGhee, one of the people behind our House and Senate forecasts.

A few weeks ago, we used our model of House elections to show the importance of the “midterm penalty” to our forecast.  All else equal, the president’s party usually does worse in midterm elections.  We showed that the penalty is large enough to prevent the Democrats from retaking the House under any reasonable set of national political conditions.

We have recently reported a forecast for a Democratic Senate that’s more pessimistic than most of the predictions out there now.  Over at, Harry Enten suggested that their own forecast—which leaned slightly toward a Republican takeover—might be too optimistic for Democrats, given that the midterm penalty was not yet part of their calculus.

What can we say about this idea?  How much is the midterm penalty really hurting the Democrats?

According to our model, the answer is: quite a bit.  The graph below replicates for Senate elections the one we created for the House.  Each line shows the odds of a Democratic Senate majority for various levels of Obama approval, first for a hypothetical 2014 that has a presidential election (the solid line) and then for the midterm election year it actually is (the dotted line).

Graph by Eric McGhee

The yawning gap between the two lines is immediately obvious.  At the current level of Obama approval, in a presidential election we would forecast a roughly three in four chance of Democrats holding the chamber.  But with the penalty, the probability is below one in five.

Unlike the House forecast, however, a Democratic Senate doesn’t seem as far-fetched.  The odds of a Democratic majority climb steeply with rising Obama approval, and reach about 50/50 at an Obama approval rating of 60%.  To be sure, we are not saying that the Democrats have little chance of maintaining a majority unless Obama’s approval rating hits 60%.  Instead, what this graph shows is how much more the playing field tilts against the president’s party in a midterm year.

But our forecast for the Senate is still fundamentally dependent on the dynamics of each race, more so even than our forecast for the House.  There are so few races that only a small number of outperforming Democrats (or underperforming Republicans) could shift the forecast and the result on Election Day.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Be a man and cry
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
Sleep advice you won't find in baby books
Play Videos
Drawing as an act of defiance
A flood of refugees from Syria but only a trickle to America
Chicago's tacos, four ways
Play Videos
What you need to know about filming the police
What you need to know about trans fats
Syrian refugee: 'I’m committed to the power of music'
Play Videos
Riding the X2 with D.C.'s most famous rapper
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
Europe's migrant crisis, explained
Next Story
Joshua Busby · April 1, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.