The Washington Post

The debt question Obama has to ask over and over

On their own, of course, getting rid of these tax preferences will produce modest revenue increases. But stack them up against cuts to, say, Pell grants, which means fewer students in college, or feeding programs for pregnant women and children. Honestly: which is the more humane and sensible way to reduce the deficit?

Moreover, this question is an effective challenge to the Republicans’ theological opposition to any tax increases of any kind. To get anywhere on the deficit, Republicans have to be forced off their absolute resistance to even a smidgen of new tax revenue. Challenging them on their weakest flank is the right way to move the argument. Once tax increases are transformed from a matter of theology to a question of sensible governance, discussions of the larger problems can become more fruitful.

E.J. Dionne writes about politics in a twice-weekly column and on the PostPartisan blog. He is also a senior fellow in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution, a government professor at Georgetown University and a frequent commentator on politics for National Public Radio, ABC’s “This Week” and NBC’s “Meet the Press.”


Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read


Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Video curated for you.