It’s worth pointing out one more time that these confrontations have a known endgame, and it involves a choice for the bulk of the House Republican conference. Sooner or later, the House will eventually pass something that the Senate Democrats can support, and that President Obama will sign, that keeps the government going beyond the end of the fiscal year. Similarly, sooner or later, the House will eventually pass something that the Senate Democrats can support, and that Obama will sign, to raise the debt limit. Those bills might come after a shutdown or a debt-limit breach, but sooner or later it’s going to happen. Absolutely everyone agrees on that.
That choice, voting for something acceptable to Democrats or allowing a “Hastert” violation, is real, and they eventually have to make it on all true must-pass bills; on everything else, there’s the third option of just letting it fail.
But it’s helpful to remember that the question about this isn’t whether they’ll eventually have this choice, but when: before or after the government shuts down; before or after the debt limit breach.
And knowing that, in turn, should clarify things for those House Republicans. Because it’s a choice they can’t get out of by being tough, or by making the right demands, or any other strategy; it’s just the basic situation they’re in.
So, yes, they can think about how best to bargain. They can also think about what cover votes they can take along the way. They can even decide, if they want, to blame Speaker John Boehner for it. But ultimately, they need to know that eventually they’ll either be voting for something that the president can sign or they’ll be allowing something to pass with mostly Democratic votes. There’s just no way to wiggle out of that reality of the situation.