Plenty of folks disagree with that assessment, including the folks at Brookings. “Like many criticisms of many presidents, policy disagreements stemming from presidential actions do not automatically make those actions illegal. Executive orders are no different,” wrote John Hudak, managing editor of the FixGov blog, in a post earlier this year. “They are not an abuse of power, but a necessary presidential power critical to the function of government.” An accompanying chart shows just how (insert air quotes here) lawless, as his critics proclaim, the president has been. And it reveals how Boehner’s lawsuit against the president would be a huge waste of time.
The graphic … shows the frequency with which presidents have issued executive orders. Republicans are right: President Obama is absolutely unique … in how infrequently he issues them! The last president to issue executive orders at such a slow rate was Grover Cleveland who served from 1885-1889 & 1893-1897. What’s more, Republican complaints about President Obama’s use of such powers is a bit ironic, given historically Republican presidents use executive orders more frequently.
This apparently doesn’t matter to Boehner. Of course, he says he’s doing this because “when there’s conflicts like this between the legislative and administrative [sic] branch it’s our responsibility to stand up.” For folks like George Will, who advocated such a lawsuit in his Sunday column, this litigation “would establish [him] as the legislature’s vindicator.”
“This is not about impeachment,” Boehner promised this morning. “This is about faithfully executing the laws of our country.” But what the speaker is doing is nothing less than a dress rehearsal for Obama’s impeachment. Given how much the word has been bandied about, Boehner’s caucus won’t be able to resist, especially if (dear Lord let it be “when”) the courts reject his frivolous lawsuit.
Follow Jonathan on Twitter: @Capehartj