2

Desktop notifications are on   | Turn off

Get breaking news alerts from The Washington Post

Turn on desktop notifications?

Yes Not now

It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. Please update your browser permissions to allow them.

The Washington Post

Clinton and the Democrats need to get more specific in this campaign season about how their plans to adjust the global thermostat will not only improve the weather, but also what it will mean for everyone’s pocketbook.

Obama didn't just take on Trump.

Even though the president took a pass on launching into an immediate faux celebration about the COP 21 agreement, there is plenty of time for his climate change victory lap.

Republicans oppose Obama’s climate plan because it won’t work, and it won’t work because Republicans oppose Obama’s climate plan.

Talking about COP21 and the alleged "settled science" of climate change would just be off-message for the Republican presidential candidates.

It's likely there will be a lot of talk at COP21 about the United States implementing measures that will be economically harmful - resulting in higher power bills for average Americans and less reliable energy – while other countries just make promises to think about making changes sometime in the future.

At home and abroad, President Obama’s quest for a legacy isn’t going so well. What does that mean for 2016?

Shouldn't we expect more than misdirected effort?

The president basically admits this has all been a waste of time.

But they show that the world shouldn't simply trust China -- or anyone else.

Load More
Most Read

opinions

post-partisan

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters