The Washington Post

FCC asks AT&T for more information on merger

AT&T President and CEO Randall Stephenson (L) and T-Mobile USA President and CEO Philipp Humm are sworn in during a hearing before the Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights Subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee. (Alex Wong, Getty Images)

The FCC’s request comes after the discovery of private AT&T documents filed to the agency that showed the company figured it would cost $3.8 billion to bring 4G LTE wireless services to 97 percent of the country.

The documents, reported by media, raised criticism that the company didn’t need to buy T-Mobile for the much bigger price tag of $39 billion. The company had unintentionally filed the documents with information intended to remain private. The FCC later took down the document from its Web site. AT&T has argued to regulators that without the merger, it wouldn’t be able to expand high-speed mobile Internet access to as many rural areas as the U.S. government would like. The company said it didn’t have a business justification for the expansion.

After the documents were exposed, critics of the merger said the company’s purchase of T-Mobile appeared to keep a key competitor out of the market instead.

AT&T played down the significance of the leaked documents and the request Wednesday for more information.

“Requests from the FCC staff for additional information are to be expected given the detailed review they are undertaking,” said AT&T spokesman Michael Balmoris. 

In a letter, Renata Hesse, senior counsel for mergers at the FCC asked AT&T to provide estimates of costs for network expansion after the merger.

“We understand that AT&T’s senior management concluded the transaction would improve the likely return on the additional LTE deployment to create a business case for this deployment where one would not exist absent the transaction,” Hesse wrote. “Although AT&T has stated that it has not quantified the transaction-related changes in the business case for extending its LTE footprint, we ask that you supplement your filing with any documents or analyses explaining why the changes in cost, revenue, and/or profitability are likely to be large enough to change the overall business case for the additional deployment.”


AT&T to throttle speeds for heaviest wireless users

AT&T says merger on track for March 2012 approval

AT&T ramps up lobbying for merger review

Cecilia Kang is a senior technology correspondent for The Washington Post.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Is fencing the answer to brain health?
Miss Manners: The technology's changed, but the rules are the same
Behind a famous and fast steam locomotive
Play Videos
This man's job is binge-watching for Netflix
How to survive a shark attack
What you need to know about trans fats
Play Videos
Michael Bolton's cinematic serenade to Detroit
How to avoid harmful chemicals in school supplies
Riding the X2 with D.C.'s most famous rapper
Play Videos
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
How to get organized for back to school
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom