The Washington Post

The story behind Hillman v. Maretta: The daughter talks about the widow and the ex-wife

It’s not a soap opera — it’s a case before the U.S. Supreme Court.

In writing Monday for She the People on Hillman v. Maretta involving the question of whether the widow or the ex-wife would receive the benefits from a federal life insurance policy, I wondered about the human details behind the law. So had some of those sharing comments on the post.

Jackie and Warren Hillman in front of Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris. (Photo courtesy of Hope Hillman Adler) Jackie and Warren Hillman in front of Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris. (Hope Hillman Adler)

The daughter of Warren Hillman — the deceased employee whose federal life insurance benefits are being contested — saw the blog and contacted me through Twitter. We talked about her father and what happened; it wasn’t what I had expected. Here’s her story, but keep in mind that what follows is one side (I was unable to contact Judy Maretta.)

It turns out that the ex-wife and the widow are wives No. 2 and No. 3, but her dad admitted he was embarrassed to think he’d been married three times, Adler told me.

She and her two brothers, who all live in the D.C. area, are the children of Hillman’s first marriage, which lasted 16 years until it ended in divorce. There are nine grandchildren. In 1989, Hillman married Judy Maretta, who was his boss at GSA. He’d previously been a budget analyst with OMB.

In 1996, he filled out a simple form to designate the beneficiary for his group life insurance policy governed under the Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance Act (FEGLIA). He named Maretta, his wife at the time, but they divorced two years later.

“It was not amicable,” Adler told me, and the two had “no contact after that.”

A few years later, he met Jacqueline – or Jackie, as Adler calls her, and they married in 2002. Hillman retired; the two traveled frequently. “They had a wonderful marriage and were very happy,” Adler said. She takes comfort in that.

In 2008, after returning home from a trip to Turkey, Hillman became ill. He was diagnosed with leukemia and died just days later at age 66. As you might expect, it was a “tumultuous” time for the family while dealing with her father’s unexpected death.

“Jackie reached out to Judy …and let her know,” Adler said. Maretta attended the funeral and was invited to the unveiling, a Jewish custom a year after the death.

She didn’t show up. No one heard from her.

In the meantime, Hillman’s will had “left everything” to Jackie and nothing to Maretta, but the family had learned that there was “a problem” with the life insurance policy. The company assured Hillman’s widow that there was no need to worry. “They said to wait a year and when it went unclaimed, she would collect the money,” Adler explained.

Except Maretta claimed it during that year and was paid $124,588.03.

Jackie Hillman could have used that money, Adler said, for her mortgage and other expenses; she ended up selling the house and moving to an apartment and continues to work part-time.

“Everybody knew he never would have wanted Judy to have the money,” Adler told me.

Enter the lawyers. Jackie Hillman, believing she, as the widow, was entitled to the money, sued to recover the benefits under the Commonwealth of Virginia’s statute that revokes a divorced spouse as a life insurance beneficiary in favor of the widow or widower.

She won the case in Fairfax County Circuit Court, which awarded her the FEGLI life insurance benefits received by Maretta. Then the ex-wife appealed the decision to the Virginia Supreme Court; it reversed the lower court’s ruling on the basis that other federal insurance programs preempt state law, according to previous U.S. Supreme Court decisions, such as Wissner v. Wissner and Ridgway v. Ridgway.

Jackie Hillman decided to pursue the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, which agreed to hear oral arguments Monday.

Adler attended the proceedings and admits that, under the law, the outcome doesn’t look favorable for her father’s widow. Although several of the justices did question the attorneys about what Hillman’s intent was, the case won’t be decided on what he wanted.

Tejinder Singh, writing for, summed up the argument with the title of his post: “Looking for the less wrong answer.” He said whether “FEGLIA’s order of precedence is solely designed for the administrative convenience of federal plan administrators (in which case the state law likely would not be preempted), or instead reflects a more robust congressional agenda to ensure that the insured’s choice of beneficiary would be honored so that designated beneficiaries not only receive, but also keep, life insurance proceeds (in which case the state law almost certainly would be preempted).”

The transcript of the arguments is more entertaining than you might think; my favorite comment came from Justice Samuel Alito: “State domestic relations law leads to a lot of nasty and difficult disputes — you know, ‘Bleak House.’ ” He wondered whether Congress, believing that, tried to simplify the beneficiary process.

He also elicited laughter when he said no one had ever reminded him, in his many years on the bench, to update his beneficiary form.

Adler said her father’s widow believes she’s done everything she can now.

Had it been an insurance policy issued through a private company, there would have been no problem, Adler said.“It’s easy to say he should have kept it up to date,” she said. “It was an oversight.”

“That particular piece of paper will get the last word,” Adler said.

 Diana Reese is a journalist in Overland Park, Kan. Follow her on Twitter at @dianareese.


Diana Reese is a journalist in Overland Park, Kan. Follow her on Twitter at @dianareese.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The Republicans debate Saturday night. The New Hampshire primary is on Feb. 9. Get caught up on the race.
Heading into the next debate...
Donald Trump returns to the Republican presidential debate stage Saturday night. Marco Rubio arrives as a sudden star, but fending off ferocious attacks from his rivals. Still glowing from his Iowa victory, Ted Cruz is trying to consolidate conservative support, while Ben Carson is struggling to avoid being typecast as the dead man walking.
Play Video
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the next state to vote, but Marco Rubio has recently seen a jump in his support, according to polls.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont. She's planning to head Sunday to Flint, Mich., where a cost-saving decision led to poisonous levels of lead in the water of the poor, heavily black, rust-belt city. 
56% 36%
Upcoming debates
Feb. 6: GOP debate

on ABC News, in Manchester, N.H.

Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.