The Washington Post

After bombings, I believed social media

Messages left at a memorial in Boston. (Jessica Rinaldi/Reuters)

SOUTH HADLEY, Mass. — Anyone who has turned on a television, radio or computer in the past couple of weeks is aware of the monsoon of misinformation surrounding the Boston Marathon bombing. But it was social media that led me astray.

The early days after the attack were chaotic: Innocent people were misidentified as suspects by citizen vigilantes on Reddit. Chechnya was widely confused with the Czech Republic as the origin of the bombers. And the New York Post got so many things wrong I’m starting to wonder if the publication thinks of inaccuracy as its signature feature, like the gap in Madonna’s front teeth.

Almost immediately, social media was buzzing with word of another bombing, one that had supposedly killed at least 30 people at a wedding celebration in Afghanistan. Reports alleged that U.S. planes had mistaken traditional shooting at the wedding for hostile fire.

Angry commenters across the Web criticized the complete absence of coverage of this terrible story by any mainstream news outlet, and expressed indignation that three lost lives in Boston should mean so much more to us than 30 in a foreign country. What many, myself included, did not initially realize, however, is that  the reports were about a real incident that had occurred over a decade ago.

I was among those who not only believed the report, but circulated it by posting it to my Facebook feed and bringing the incident up in conversation. I self-righteously argued that we seem not to care about the suffering of citizens in Afghanistan, and thus don’t even find it worth reporting.

I saw the story as the perfect tool to help me correct the intolerance of those who see all Muslims as extremists. But when I discovered that the report was about an incident from 2002, I stopped short, deflated by the likelihood that somebody had intentionally circulated the old story in order to serve an agenda.

By referencing the story, I was unintentionally exhibiting a lack of sensitivity the very thing I’d been arguing against.

I knew that I still wanted to do something to promote more understanding between U.S. and Afghan citizens, but now that my pitch had been tainted with untruth, I was unsure  how to proceed.

Then, as I scanned news and social media sites, one story that caught my eye made clear to me what the mistake in my approach had been. Documentary filmmaker Beth Murphy had been working in Afghanistan when she heard about the bombing in her home city of Boston. Seeking to send home support, she set out to take a series of photographs of herself holding a sign that read “From Kabul to Boston with Love.”

NBC World News reports that as Murphy spoke with Afghan citizens, she was surprised to find not indifference, but heartfelt sympathy. “As I started to talk with people here about what was happening,” Murphy said, “ I saw the expressions on their faces change. They experience things like this here all the time. … There was this shared experience of pain and suffering, and the way people expressed that to me was really beautiful.” It struck Murphy to ask the citizens if she could photograph them holding her sign. The result was a moving series of photos that demonstrated to the U.S. that Afghan citizens were in fact not a country of extremists, but people who felt empathy for Americans.

These images saturated the Internet, too, and were even responded to by Boston residents holding a similar sign of their own to send the love back to Kabul.

It’s true that the marathon bombings claimed fewer lives than have been lost in any number of attacks in Afghanistan, and Murphy mentioned that some of the citizens in Kabul (though too polite to say so) were surprised when they heard that the initial deaths numbered only three.

What’s important, though, is that her work inspired more understanding than a self-righteous argument ever would have, and I won’t forget that.

Lauren Quirici is a student at Mount Holyoke College.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The South Carolina GOP primary and the Nevada Democratic caucuses are next on Feb. 20. Get caught up on the race.
Past South Carolina GOP primary winners
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the first state in the South to vote, where he faces rivals Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
We'll have half a million voters in South Carolina. I can shake a lot of hands, but I can't shake that many.
Sen. Marco Rubio, speaking to a group of reporters about his strategy to regain support after a poor performance in the last debate
Fact Checker
Sanders’s claim that Clinton objected to meeting with ‘our enemies’
Sanders said that Clinton was critical of Obama in 2008 for suggesting meeting with Iran. In fact, Clinton and Obama differed over whether to set preconditions, not about meeting with enemies. Once in office, Obama followed the course suggested by Clinton, abandoning an earlier position as unrealistic.
Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio
The complicated upcoming voting schedule
Feb. 20

Democrats caucus in Nevada; Republicans hold a primary in South Carolina.

Feb. 23

Republicans caucus in Nevada.

Feb. 27

Democrats hold a primary in South Carolina.

Upcoming debates
Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.