The Washington Post

Ottawa professor: Women evolved to talk smack about each other


The Real Housewives of Miami. (Photo by: Glenn Watson/Bravo)

A professor at the University of Ottawa is claiming that women are hard-wired for mean-girl behavior and that we use it as a tool when competing for mates.

Pardon me. I have to excuse myself so I can meander to the women’s restroom and say something catty about Tracy Vaillancourt and her apparent allergy to empirical evidence.

Vaillancourt, the lead author of the analysis, published in the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B., reached this conclusion after reviewing nearly 100 evolutionary psychology papers, but she didn’t conduct any studies of her own to test her claims, first reported by ABC News.

This makes her conclusions irresponsible at best, as they feed into the worst sorts of stereotypes about women, and there’s not much to back them up. What’s left is one professor’s attempt to lend an air of credibility to the portrayals of women on shows like “Real Housewives” and “The Bachelor.”

Christopher Ryan, co-author of “Sex at Dawn: The Prehistoric Origins of Modern Sexuality,” said that Vaillancourt reached her conclusions while neglecting to factor in societal forces that could also be used to explain trash talking among women.

“This is not to say there isn’t ANY biological basis for some of these observations,” Ryan said in an email. “For example, women are apparently more verbal, and gossip does seem to be observed more in women across many societies than in men. But the passive-aggressive ‘catty’ behavior cited in the article presumes that this gossip is meant to destroy other women, which takes those observations to another level.”

What’s more, Vaillancourt conveniently ignores the results of a 2009 study conducted by Dr. Nicholas Emler, whose study of 300 people found that both men and women gossip. In fact, 80 percent of human communication is gossip, but only five percent comprises the sort of nastiness we tend to associate with socially sadistic high school girls. Furthermore, Emler told London’s Daily Mail that men were twice as likely as women to make petty remarks about a person’s looks.

These claims aren’t just irresponsible because they reinforce sexist and pernicious stereotypes about women. They also undermine the work of credible evolutionary psychologists. Feminists find ourselves clashing with evolutionary psychologists when their work  reinforces the same traditional gender roles that we’re working to dismantle. Just look at any Jezebel post written in response to a study like this. It’s dangerous to dismiss an entire scientific discipline, but it’s difficult not to when findings always seem to have one message: Ladies be crazy, because SCIENCE.

Even Ryan said Vaillancourt’s findings were “a rehashing of the conventional [evolutionary psychology] dogma which typically fails to distinguish between behaviors that are responsive to particular social contexts and biological imperatives.”

“I find that the reluctance of most evolutionary psychologists to address the political contexts in which human behavior takes place renders many of their insights meaningless and, ironically, deeply political,” Ryan said. “To show you what I mean, take the same argument Vaillancourt is making here and change a few details and you’ll arrive at the conclusion that black people are biologically programmed to be criminals. After all, a much higher proportion of blacks go to prison than whites, right? Must be in their DNA. By ignoring the messy historical, economic, and political contexts in which our behavior occurs, too many researchers merely end up providing pseudo-scientific justification for the status quo.”

Soraya Nadia McDonald covered arts, entertainment and culture with a focus on issues surrounding race, gender and sexuality.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
The Democrats debated Thursday night. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Chris Cillizza on the Democratic debate...
On Clinton: She poked a series of holes in Sanders's healthcare proposal and broadly cast him as someone who talks a big game but simply can't hope to achieve his goals.

On Sanders: If the challenge was to show that he could be a candidate for people other than those who already love him, he didn't make much progress toward that goal. But he did come across as more well-versed on foreign policy than in debates past.
Quoted
We are in vigorous agreement here.
Hillary Clinton, during the PBS Democratic debate, a night in which her and Sanders shared many of the same positions on issues
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the polls as he faces rivals Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz heading into the S.C. GOP primary on Feb. 20.
Fact Checker
Trump’s claim that his border wall would cost $8 billion
The billionaire's claim is highly dubious. Based on the costs of the Israeli security barrier (which is mostly fence) and the cost of the relatively simple fence already along the U.S.-Mexico border, an $8 billion price tag is simply not credible.
Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands
Most Read

national

she-the-people

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.