The Washington Post

Who gives the most to campaigns? Men or women?

A new study shows who gives what and to whom when it comes to political campaigns.  The report, called “Money in Politics with a Gender Lens,” put out by the National Council for Research on Women and in collaboration with the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University’s Eagleton Institute of Politics and the Center for Responsive Politics,  shows that men give more than women, notably in the mega-donor, high-roller category.

Since the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision in January of 2010, campaigns have been awash in money at every level.  And the trend will likely continue this year, with the U.S. Senate up for grabs and competitive House and governor’s races across the country.  With a likely bumper crop of female candidates and active outside groups, it will be interesting to see how this year stacks up with other off-year elections when it comes to women giving to campaigns.

Here are three takeaways from the report:

1.  Women invest in campaigns at lower rates

While the 2008 pre-Citizens United presidential campaign represented a high water mark for women in terms of percentage of giving, in 2010 and 2012 it dropped.  Based on the past three cycles, women average about 30 percent of the campaign donor pool. At higher levels of giving, the so-called mega-donors, the gap is greater.  The data suggest that women are more apt to give in presidential cycles and that level of donor engagement seems to correlate to good years for Democrats.

But although women still give less than men, they are part of an overall trend of both groups giving more.  In 2012, men gave $2.9 billion while women gave $2.3 billion, according to the report.  The reason? A study done in 2007 by the Women’s Campaign fund suggests that women are more likely to see voting and volunteering as part of their civic responsibilities, not donating to campaigns. The study also revealed that, at the time, women weren’t as likely to see a connection between money and political change and leadership.

2. Women give to people, not groups. 

Women vastly upped their contributions to outside groups in 2012 — men saw a 10-fold increase and women saw a 20-fold increase.  But men still gave more than 4 times what women gave in 2012.  And men go to outside groups at a higher rate.  In 2010, men gave 3.5 percent of their total contributions to outside groups, while women gave only 1.2 percent.  In 2012, a presidential cycle, the percentages jumped for both men and women — men gave 18.5 percent of their total donations to outside groups, and women gave 11.1 percent. The report does suggest a new trend — more outside groups on both sides of the aisle dedicated to electing women.

3.  Large donors are less likely to be women

In 2008, then-Sen. Barack Obama relied on small dollar donations, raising some $114 million from people giving $200 or less.  But still, his campaign, as do most campaigns, rely much more heavily on large dollar donations, and those donors are much, much more likely to be men.  In 2012, 11 of the 100 top individual donors to candidates and outside groups were women, and 88 were men.  (According to a footnote in the study, the gender of one donor could not be ascertained.) In 2010, there were 17 women in the top 100, and in 2008, 20 of the top donors were women. Mega-donations often come with access to candidates and campaigns, and the gender gap worsens at higher levels of giving.

Nia-Malika Henderson is a political reporter for The Fix.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The New Hampshire primary is Tuesday. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Dan Balz says ...
This was supposed to be the strongest Republican presidential field in memory, but cracks are showing. At Saturday night's debate, Marco Rubio withered in the face of unyielding attacks from Chris Christie, drawing attention to the biggest question about his candidacy: Is he ready to be president? How much the debate will affect Rubio's standing Tuesday is anybody's guess. But even if he does well, the question about his readiness to serve as president and to go up against Clinton, if she is the Democratic nominee, will linger.
Play Video
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the next state to vote, but Marco Rubio has recently seen a jump in his support, according to polls.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont. She left the state Sunday to go to Flint, Mich., where a cost-saving decision led to poisonous levels of lead in the water of the poor, heavily black, rust-belt city. 
55% 40%
Play Video
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.