“Mitt Romney could end up being the most hapless presidential nominee since Hubert Humphrey in 1968. Romney aims to lead a party whose base is in revolt — against him. Just like liberals were in revolt against Humphrey in 1968,” writes Third Way’s Bill Schneider. (Politico)

Cato’s Michael Tanner says there is no debate about contraception or religious freedom--it’s about economic choice. (New York Daily News)

Room for Debate asks: Why are lawmakers so hung up on marriage? If fewer Americans are choosing to marry, what are the legal implications for relationships that are based on something other than marriage or parenting? (New York Times)

Hoover’s Deroy Murdock: The HHS Mandate: Why? (National Review)

Elliott Abrams: Turning point in Bahrain. (CNN)

Five lessons from Libya. (National Review)

Cato’s Richard Rahn: Obama has no Plan B. (Washington Times)