But the agency still has a long way to go toward addressing well over 5 million disaster-loan applications it received as the economic crisis set in. And questions linger about whether the loan funds — which are part of a separate program from the larger Paycheck Protection Program — are being distributed fairly and effectively.
A Washington Post analysis of SBA spending found drastic variation in state-by-state loan receipts, highlighting how the current effort to bolster the economy with federal funds could contribute to stark inequalities in how wealth is distributed across the United States.
“With respect to the economic injury disaster loan (EIDL) program, SBA’s Office of Disaster Assistance (ODA) has now approved and distributed more in loans for COVID-19 than for all other disasters combined in the history of the agency,” SBA administrator Jovita Carranza said in prepared remarks for a congressional hearing scheduled for Wednesday.
The Post’s analysis is based on June 6 loan figures published by the Small Business Administration, which were then adjusted based on the number of small businesses in the state. Because not all small businesses applied for an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) — about half did, according to a survey from the National Federation for Independent Business — the average size of each loan is likely to be larger than depicted above.
About 40 percent of the SBA’s EIDL funding as of June 6 was captured by four states: California, New York, Florida and Texas. A few states with relatively small economies received an outsize share of the disaster-loan funding after adjusting for the number of small businesses in the state. Meanwhile several states that were hit hard by the coronavirus received a relatively low amount of funding through EIDL, even after adjusting for the number of small businesses in the state.
When adjusted for the size of its small-business community, West Virginia did worse than every other state, for example. Small businesses in West Virginia received 2,781 EIDL loans for a total of $178 million.
In response to questions from The Post, Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.) expressed frustration that businesses in his state had received so little funding.
“It is clear there is something very wrong with the distribution of these funds," Manchin wrote in a statement. “I will demand the SBA provide an explanation for this unacceptable difference and urge them to correct the unequal distribution of the EIDL funds. West Virginia businesses are struggling to stay afloat during this healthcare crisis and deserve to be supported at the same level as other small businesses across the nation.”
The SBA has refused to release records showing which businesses received federal coronavirus assistance, even though such information has been released on the agency’s website in the past. The Post is among 11 news organizations suing the SBA for access to the data.
The EIDL program is different from the $660 billion Paycheck Protection Program that is part of the Cares Act. The EIDL loans are handled directly by the government rather than private lenders, making them more appropriate for entrepreneurs who don’t have deep banking-industry connections. They are favored by many business owners because more of the funding can be spent on bills including rent and utilities.
The EIDL program was activated March 12, several weeks before Congress passed the Cares Act, making it the first federal small business aid program to address the economic crisis.
But the program could not address the crisis as quickly as members of Congress and federal officials had hoped. The SBA’s Office of Disaster Assistance received an unprecedented crush of applications in mid-March when the economic crisis deepened, and found it did not have the infrastructure in place to process so many applications in a timely manner.
The agency received several million loan applications within a few days, SBA officials have said. A person familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the person was not authorized to discuss the issue, said the total amount of loans received eventually climbed to between 5 million and 6 million applications before the SBA closed its application portal in late April.
The SBA initially said it would be able to process most loans in three weeks. But it took six weeks to approve just the first 39,000 EIDL loans, amounting to less than one percent of its total application backlog.
And some business owners are finding the loans are too small to be of much help. To ensure it won’t run out of funding, the SBA slashed the size of its EIDL loans to $150,000 per application, a drop in the bucket for all but the smallest companies.
Early on in the process, the SBA attempted to solve the problem by outsourcing much of its loan evaluation work to Rocket Loans. The Rocket Loans work is being handled through an existing contract with a Herndon, Va.-based company called RER Solutions, worth at least $350 million, to manage loan recommendations and analysis, according to contract documents.
Over the past few months the SBA has hired new loan reviewers, largely through contractors, according to people involved in the process who were not authorized to discuss the issue publicly. And the agency has changed its processes in ways that have sped up loan approvals while decreasing the size of loans and grants that businesses receive, according to SBA officials and people familiar with the matter.
The first 1.1 million EIDL loans have been allocated in a widely divergent manner from one state to the next, according to the figures released Saturday by the SBA.
Businesses in California led the way in EIDL loan receipts, with $15.1 billion going to 196,365 businesses. Texas and Florida received $6.7 billion and $6.9 billion respectively. New York, with the worst coronavirus outbreak in the country, received just over $6 billion in EIDL loans.
And several states with smaller economies managed to nab an outsize share of small business aid through the EIDL program. When adjusted for the number of small businesses operating in the state, Nevada, Hawaii and Louisiana received the most help by far. Nevada received about $12,200 per small business, about twice as much as a typical state.
Midwestern and Mountain states that depend heavily on agribusiness fared poorly in the EIDL program’s first three months, possibly because farms were initially excluded. Among 12 states that received less than $6,000 per small business, seven were agriculture-heavy states including Missouri, Iowa and Nebraska.