The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness

USDA announces rigorous new school nutrition standards

New rules aimed at reducing sugars, fat and salt and increasing whole grains in school meals are drawing backlash, even as childhood obesity increases

Nutrition standards have remained lax during the pandemic, as school cafeterias struggled with supply-chain crises and labor shortages. (Alberto Mariani/AP)
Listen
6 min

The Biden administration on Friday announced more stringent nutrition standards for school meals, reviving efforts to improve the health of millions of public school students in the face of a staggering rise in childhood obesity and other diet-related diseases.

The new rules, which will be rolled out gradually over the next few years, will limit added sugars, including in flavored milks. Previously, there was no federal standard for how much sugar could be included in school meals. The rules will also further reduce the allowable amounts of sodium, and emphasize whole grains.

The new guidelines are part of a broader campaign by the U.S. Agriculture Department to address the persistent and worsening problem of childhood obesity. The agency is responsible for administering nutritional programs that in recent years have fed around 30 million students at nearly 100,000 schools nationally.

Childhood obesity rates have tripled over the past three decades. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that about 1 in 5 children and adolescents are affected by obesity. That’s about 14.7 million children, or almost 20 percent of all those ages 2 to 19.

According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, it is one of the most common pediatric chronic diseases — associated with hypertension, sleep apnea, diabetes, fatty liver disease and depression. From 2001 to 2017, the number of people under age 20 living with Type 2 diabetes grew by 95 percent, according to CDC data. A poor diet increases a person’s risk of developing Type 2 diabetes.

“We must all step up to support child health if we are to achieve the Biden-Harris Administration’s goal of ending hunger and reducing diet-related diseases by 2030,” Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said in a statement. “Many children aren’t getting the nutrition they need, and diet-related diseases are on the rise.”

Vilsack, in a briefing Friday, said improving child nutrition is critical for national security, equity and economic competitiveness. He called obesity a burden on children that can lead to low self esteem and poor academic performance.

The new effort echoes actions by the Obama administration, which required school cafeterias to increase offerings of fruits and vegetables, serve only skim or low-fat milk, and cut trans fat from the menu altogether. They also required dramatic cuts in sodium in school cafeteria food as well as increases in whole-grain offerings.

The Trump administration chipped away at those Obama-era rules, arguing that healthier food was of no benefit if children didn’t like it. President Donald Trump’s agriculture secretary, Sonny Perdue, cited food waste and nonparticipation as key rationales for the shift, even though an agency study failed to support that thesis.

Why is the USDA downplaying good news about this Obama-era school nutrition program?

Nutrition standards have remained lax during the pandemic, as school cafeterias struggled with supply chain crises and labor shortages.

The new guidelines will be rolled out gradually. In the fall of 2024, school offerings will have to include primarily whole-grain foods, with only occasional products containing less healthy refined grains such as those used in white pasta and white breads.

In the fall of 2025, there will be a limit imposed on high-sugar products like sweetened yogurts and cereals, a reduction of weekly sodium limits by 10 percent for school breakfasts and lunches, and limits on added sugars for flavored milks such as chocolate milk. Further reductions in added sugar and sodium are slated for following years.

Republican politicians have been critical of heavier regulation of school meals. And industry groups are pushing back against these limits, arguing that school meal participation is already slipping and this will further discourage students from eating at school.

During the pandemic, all students were eligible for free school meals. Since that benefit ended at the beginning of this school year, there has been a drop in total participation.

The nonprofit School Nutrition Association, a school food trade group, said that the new standards are “unrealistic” and will be unachievable for most schools nationwide, citing supply chain disruptions, labor shortages and other financial challenges. In a recent survey of members, nearly 90 percent said they have challenges obtaining sufficient whole-grain, low-sodium and low-fat options to meet standards that exist now.

“We see children choose not to eat at all if a meal is not familiar or appetizing to them, and it’s heartbreaking, particularly for food-insecure families who rely on school meals,” said SNA President Lori Adkins. “School nutrition staff work tirelessly to keep students choosing and consuming healthy school meals; we must continue to support those efforts.”

The International Dairy Foods Association has cautioned the USDA about reducing flavored milk options, citing a USDA advisory committee that found that 90 percent of all Americans and 79 percent of children ages 9 to 13 don’t consume the government’s recommended amount of dairy.

Obesity among children ages 5 to 11 rises during the pandemic

“Continuing to offer wholesome dairy products like low-fat flavored milk to students of all ages makes good sense because it’s an excellent source of 13 essential nutrients kids need for growth and development and has been shown to improve overall participation in school meals, increasing consumption of needed nutrients,” IDFA President Michael Dykes said Friday in a statement.

The dairy industry petitioned the Obama administration to allow sugar substitutes such as sucralose in school milks to adhere to reduced sugar mandates, but that has not yet been allowed. Many pediatricians discourage children’s consumption of low- and non-calorie sweeteners.

More than 70 percent of students who eat school meals qualify as low-income and are getting meals free or for a reduced price. Low-income children and adolescents are more likely to be obese than their higher income counterparts, according to the CDC.

The new rules strike a balance between practical and tasty, going beyond the previous rules by adding sugar standards, said Geri Henchy, director of nutrition policy at the nonprofit Food Research and Action Center. She said the food industry now offers plenty of low-sugar options that are appealing to kids.

“There were rules about fat but not about sugar, so food manufacturers would cut the fat and make up for it with sugar,” Henchy said. “By doing this they are going to ensure that the school breakfast and lunches are more consistent with the [federal government’s] dietary guidelines and helping to support a healthy weight for children.”

Loading...