Three-quarters of them, however, belong to men.
“If you don’t have that degree, you better be a guy,” said Nicole Smith, chief economist at the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.
Men have long dominated manufacturing, mining and construction — some of the best-paying fields open to high school graduates.
These goods-producing positions swelled 3.3 percent in the year before July, the strongest pace since 1984, according to a recent Washington Post analysis.
The upswing after a long lag has exacerbated the country’s labor shortage — there are more jobs open in the United States than workers to fill them. So, employers and unions lately have tried to recruit more women into traditionally masculine trades. The effort has introduced paid maternity leave, for example, to some ironworking roles.
But the share of female employees in such areas has remained stubbornly tiny, Smith said. Women hold fewer than a third of the country’s factory jobs, which can command salaries above $50,000, and they fill just 9 percent of construction positions. (The average annual income, per the Bureau of Labor Statistics: $40,000.)
Analysts say blue-collar jobs, even with increasing perks, have an image problem — society still doesn’t expect to see a woman wielding a jackhammer — and women who try to break into the industries face discrimination from bosses and colleagues.
Nearly 9 in 10 female construction workers have dealt with sexual harassment on the job, one Labor Department study found.
It’s hard to say how long the blue-collar growth spurt will last. A million more goods-producing jobs existed before the recession, The Post’s Heather Long reported. Today’s gains could vanish if the economy slips.
Since the downturn, women without degrees have cycled into more enduring — if worse-paying — types of work.
They tend to make a living in hospitality (51 percent female), child care (94 percent female), health care (78.5 percent female) and bookkeeping (60 percent female), government figures show.
Secretarial and administrative roles typically provided bigger paychecks to women with high school diplomas — median pay: $37,870 per year — but such work is shrinking.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects a 5 percent job loss in the field over the next decade as more companies automate tasks such as scheduling, record-keeping and data collection.
Nowadays, the jobless rate for women with only a high school diploma (4.7 percent) is higher than for men with the same educational attainment (3.5 percent). They’re also making less money.
Among workers without college degrees, women earn an average of 78.6 percent of what men take home, according to a recent analysis from the Institute for Women’s Policy Research. (That ratio is 80.4 percent in the broader economy.)
Ariane Hegewisch, program director of employment and earnings at IWPR, blames the wage imbalance on occupational segregation. The gender divide is particularly deep in fields full of workers with lower educational attainment.
Economists say more women entering managerial roles in the ’80s and ’90s reduced the gap among highly educated workers. Stereotypes about gender roles have more clearly persisted in fields with a historically extreme gender imbalance.
“Elder care, nursing home care, home health assistance — these jobs are growing a lot,” Hegewisch said. “They’re low-wage, and they’re predominantly female.”
Employment of nursing assistants and orderlies, including home health aides, is expected to surge by 17 percent through 2024 — or double the growth rate for all occupations, according to BLS figures. (Nursing assistants make an average of roughly $26,000 per year.)
Health-care workers won’t have to worry about the need for their work diminishing as the population ages, said Martha Gimbel, research director for the Hiring Lab at Indeed, a jobs site. Market forces, though, aren’t likely to lift their wages much, because Medicaid funds the pay of many health aides in nursing homes and private residences. Elderly or disabled customers often can’t afford to spend more on their services.
Fifty-five percent of home health workers subsist on incomes below 200 percent of the federal poverty line, per IWPR research.