The Washington Post

Public interest group sues U.S. over JPMorgan settlement

Better Markets, which has been critical of Wall Street and regulators since the financial crisis, said top Justice officials should not have been allowed to give JPMorgan “blanket civil immunity.” (Justin Lane/European Pressphoto Agency)

A public interest group on Monday sued the Justice Department over last year’s record $13 billion settlement with
JPMorgan Chase, arguing that the deal to resolve investigations into faulty mortgage investments was unconstitutional because courts did not review it.

Better Markets, which has been critical of Wall Street and regulators in the aftermath of the financial crisis, said that Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. and other top Justice officials should not have been allowed to give JPMorgan “blanket civil immunity for years of alleged pervasive, egregious and knowing fraudulent and illegal conduct that contributed to the 2008 financial crash and the worst economy since the Great Depression.”

“The bailouts and suffering of the American people in 2008 and 2009 were bad enough,” Dennis Kelleher, president of Better Markets, told reporters at a news conference.

“It’s too much to ask taxpayers and the American people to put up with a secret backroom deal that might well be another sweetheart deal for yet another big Wall Street bank,” he said.

After negotiations that included Holder and JPMorgan chief executive Jamie Dimon, the bank agreed in November to the largest settlement ever by an American company.

The deal included a $2 billion civil penalty and $4 billion to help struggling homeowners nationwide. JPMorgan admitted to knowingly selling toxic mortgage-backed securities that helped cause the subprime housing bubble and the financial crisis that followed.

The settlement did not resolve a criminal investigation into
JPMorgan’s activities that is being conducted by the U.S. attorney’s office in Sacramento.

Kelleher said that it is unconstitutional for a settlement of that size to be completed without judicial review.

He questioned whether the $13 billion payment by JPMorgan was enough to offset the damage caused to the economy and said there wasn’t enough information in the settlement to determine if it was fair.

“You can’t cut that deal and cut out the judicial branch of the government,” Kelleher said.

Kelleher said that the suit was novel and predicted it would be hotly contested.

A Justice Department spokeswoman did not immediately return a request for comment.

The JPMorgan settlement also has been criticized because a large part of the payment is tax-deductible. Lawmakers have introduced legislation prohibiting the ability of companies to get deductions for penalties paid as part of government settlements.

Better Markets filed the suit in U.S. District Court in Washington.

— Los Angeles Times

Show Comments

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.