The loan program created under the $2.2 trillion CARES Act caps interest at 1%, waives several borrower standards and allows for possible forgiveness as great as the loan’s full principal depending on the company’s payroll costs and other factors, the judge said. Claiming that such an offer is a loan rather than a subsidy “is a distinction without a difference,” according to the ruling.
“There is no doubt that PPP loans confer a financial benefit not otherwise available to businesses in the open market,” the judge said. “This is, of course, the point of an economic stimulus -- to prop up the economy while the private sector struggles to provide gainful employment to Americans seeking work.”
The American Association of Political Consultants said it would appeal.
“Most of our member firms are small businesses, with a majority having fewer than 10 employees,” President Rose Kapolczynski said in a statement, adding that the economic crisis will weigh especially on those that depend heavily on personal contact, such as signature gathering and event organizing.
“Our members are excluded solely because they help clients exercise their First Amendment rights,” she said.
The case is American Association of Political Consultants v. U.S. Small Business Administration, 20-cv-970, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia.
• Lobbyists, Pollsters, Strippers Sue U.S. for Some Covid Cash
• Lobbyists Say They’re Not Getting Fair Shake at U.S. Virus Loans
• House Set to Pass New Stimulus With Plans to Dole Out More
(Updates with comment by the American Association of Political Consultants)
For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com
©2020 Bloomberg L.P.