Its size is not what makes it noteworthy — it’s what the break itself says about the natural process of iceberg calving, the way climate change might be destabilizing ice shelves similar to the Brunt, and how the movement could jeopardize the critical scientific research human residents have conducted there for more than 60 years.
Since 1956, British scientists have been studying geology, glaciology and the atmosphere at the Halley Research Station on the Brunt Ice Shelf. The lab, which has been torn down and rebuilt many times over the decades, took its most recent form in 2012 when the Halley VI Research Station — a mobile, modular structure — delivered its first scientific data.
That same year, satellite monitoring showed that a large chasm in the ice shelf — officially named Chasm 1 — was growing for the first time in more than three decades. By a glaciologist’s definition, a chasm is described as a very large crack that visibly extends through the ice shelf to the sea.
If it kept growing, Chasm 1 would have eventually marooned the Halley VI station, so the British Antarctic Survey decided to move its researchers further inland and a safe distance from the chasm during several months in 2016 and 2017.
But in October 2016, another crack — called the Halloween crack — quickly formed 17 kilometers north of the research station. It continues to extend east.
In the two years since, Chasm 1 has crept closer to the Halloween crack, preparing scientists for the inevitability of a iceberg breakaway that could have consequences for the stability of the entire Brunt Ice Shelf. NASA predicts the mass could span 1,700 square kilometers (660 square miles), which would make it the largest iceberg to break from the Brunt Ice Shelf in more than 100 years.
“It’s a large berg, but it’s not a massive berg — not by Antarctic standards,” said Christopher Shuman, a research scientist at the University of Maryland Baltimore County’s Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology at NASA. “The impact on the area is that these rifts have reactivated, and we’re not sure why. A new rift [the Halloween crack] formed in what was thought to be a pretty stable ice shelf."
Scientists have been studying glacier shelves only for a little more than 100 years, so it’s difficult to say whether icebergs are calving at a higher rate at this location on the Brunt Ice Shelf, said Helen Fricker, a glaciologist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
“I don’t think you can link one calving event to climate change," Fricker said. “That isn’t to say Antarctica isn’t undergoing rapid changes that are linked to climate change. But it’s in another region of Antarctica.”
Iceberg calving is a normal, natural process that helps maintain Antarctica’s net land mass. Floating ice shelves fringe the coasts of the continent, growing upward and outward as heavy snows fall. (You can see how the Brunt Ice Shelf has grown here.)
“This is how Antarctica works," Fricker said. “Icebergs come and icebergs go.”
Research shows that on the west side of the continent, where waters are warmer than those surrounding Brunt, the ice shelves are thinning from below. In that region, scientists say climate change has a clear role.
On the Brunt, there is no immediate threat to Halley VI or the people who inhabit it. Its current location is outside the predicted iceberg mass, but a spokesperson at the British Antarctic Survey said researchers are monitoring changes to the structural integrity of the ice shelf.
Part of that monitoring has included the precautionary measure of closing down operations at the research station for the past three Antarctic winters, which feature months of darkness and heavy snowfall. Under those conditions, it would be more dangerous to launch a rescue mission if the cracks and chasms were to compromise the safety of researchers at Halley VI.
Staff members are currently preparing to leave for winter 2019. (Seasons are reversed in the Southern Hemisphere,)
“Contingency plans are in place should ice conditions change significantly before departure of staff from the station,” the British Antarctic Survey told The Washington Post in a statement. “The station is designed to be relocatable. The frequency of relocation depends very much on how the ice behaves in the future."