





Natural gas
Electricity
Propane
Wood
Oil






Natural gas
Electricity
Propane
Wood
Oil
U.S. home heating is fractured in surprising ways: Look up your neighborhood
The split shows that much of the South, and rural America, could ditch fossil fuels easier than big cities and the coasts
Until recently, you might not have focused much on whether you need gas, oil or electricity to warm your house. But in America’s highly fractured energy landscape, the surprising ways our home heating is split could speed — or slow — our shift away from fossil fuels.
There are four main ways that Americans heat their homes: electricity, natural gas, propane or fuel oil. The vast majority of U.S. homes, nearly 90 percent, get their warmth from either electricity — in the form of old, inefficient electric resistance heaters or new, more efficient heat pumps — or from natural gas that is piped into homes and burned in a natural gas furnace. The remaining homes use propane — a fossil fuel created by natural gas processing or oil refining — or fuel oil, both of which need to be delivered to homes by truck.
But these fuels are not evenly distributed across the entire country.
Thanks to a combination of local climates, electricity prices and historical accident, America’s home heating system, like the country’s politics, is deeply divided. In the South, thanks to government funding from almost a century ago and mild climates, many rely on electricity to stay warm. The Midwest is dominated by natural gas and, in rural areas, propane. In the Northeast, despite high prices and inconvenience, fuel oil still heats many homes.

Map shows fuel most used
for home heating
Oil
Propane
Natural
gas
Boston
New York
Chicago
D.C.
Atlanta
Dallas
Electricity
Houston
Miami
Seattle
Wood
San Francisco
Denver
Los Angeles
Oil

Map shows fuel most used
for home heating
Oil
Propane
Natural gas
Minneapolis
Boston
New York
Philadelphia
Chicago
D.C.
St. Louis
Atlanta
Dallas
Electricity
New Orleans
Houston
Miami
Seattle
Wood
San Francisco
Denver
Los Angeles
Phoenix
Oil
Anchorage
Honolulu

Map shows fuel most used
for home heating
Seattle
Oil
Propane
Natural
gas
Minneapolis
Boston
New York
Chicago
San Francisco
D.C.
Denver
St. Louis
Los Angeles
Atlanta
Phoenix
Dallas
Oil
Electricity
Houston
Anchorage
Honolulu
Miami

Seattle
Oil
Map shows fuel most used
for home heating
Propane
Natural gas
Minneapolis
Minneapolis
Boston
Wood
New York
Philadelphia
Chicago
Chicago
San Francisco
San Francisco
Denver
Denver
D.C.
St. Louis
St. Louis
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
San Diego
San Diego
Phoenix
Phoenix
Atlanta
Atlanta
Dallas
Dallas
Electricity
New
Orleans
Oil
Houston
Houston
Anchorage
Honolulu
Miami

Seattle
Oil
Propane
Map shows fuel most used
for home heating
Natural gas
Minneapolis
Boston
Wood
Detroit
New York
Philadelphia
Chicago
San Francisco
Denver
Washington, D.C.
St. Louis
Los Angeles
San Diego
Phoenix
Atlanta
Dallas
Electricity
Oil
Houston
New Orleans
Tampa
Anchorage
Honolulu
Miami
How did something as simple as how we heat our homes become so fractured — and what will that mean as the country struggles to move away from fossil fuels?
The country’s map of home heating shows that, as the Biden administration works to electrify America, the regions that will have the easiest time — and save the most cash in the process — are ones where many politicians don’t embrace President Biden’s policies.
Search the map See how homes are heated in your neighborhood
Take the South, for example. In 1960, only 2 percent of homes in the United States were heated by electricity. By 2000, around 29 percent were — and most of them were in the South.
Lucas Davis, an energy economist at the University of California at Berkeley, says that the South’s climate and energy costs spurred rapid adoption of electric heating. Starting in the 1960s, when developers were building new homes across the South, electricity prices started to fall significantly — due in part to the Tennessee Valley Authority’s generous power supply. Today, electricity in the South still tends to be cheaper than in many other areas of the country.
At the same time, the South’s mild winters also made electricity an attractive option. “You need less heat in the Southeast,” Davis said. Natural gas, he explained, is generally cheaper than electric resistance per unit of heating — but it comes with much higher capital costs. In a region where heat might only be required for a month or two out of the year, electric heating wins out financially. “Energy prices,” Davis said, “are by far the most important factor.”
In colder regions of the country, however, the calculus was different. When homes were being built across the Midwest and Northeast, electric heating was still limited to expensive electric resistance heaters or first-generation heat pumps, which didn’t work when temperatures dipped below freezing. (Modern air-source heat pumps now function well below freezing temperatures.)
That left a few viable options: natural gas in pipelines or truck-delivered liquid fuels such as propane or fuel oil. In more urban areas, natural gas made financial sense. Natural gas pipelines are capital-intensive: Laying a pipeline to service five homes on a one-mile stretch doesn’t make much financial sense, but laying a pipeline to service 1,000 homes could bring in tons of cash.
Share of homes using natural gas and electricity in counties with cold vs. warm winters
Note: Circle size represents the number of homes in each county. Counties in Hawaii are not shown.
“The question becomes — is it dense enough for us to build the gas infrastructure?” said Lacey Tan, a manager for carbon-free buildings at the energy think tank RMI. “And not just population density, but how connected the homes are in a region.”
Homes using fuel oil or propane, on the other hand, often sat in rural areas without an easy connection to a natural gas network. And in the Northeast, many homes were also built before 1920 — a time when fuel oil furnaces were commonplace in new construction.
West
Note: Each circle is a county.
Northeast
Midwest
South