The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness

Emotional protests continue after Supreme Court strikes down Roe v. Wade

The crowd outside the Supreme Court swelled Saturday in a second day of demonstrations over the divisive ruling.

An abortion rights activist, left, and an antiabortion activist, right, outside the Supreme Court on June 25. (Astrid Riecken for The Washington Post)

More than a thousand abortion rights demonstrators, chanting loudly and waving placards, gathered near the Supreme Court building Saturday for a second day of protests after the court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade, adding their voices to renewed outpourings of emotion across the country in the wake of the historic ruling.

By late Saturday morning, a throng of protesters had massed on First Street NE, between the Capitol and Supreme Court, in a gathering that was noisy but peaceful — although some abortion rights advocates engaged in angry exchanges with antiabortion activists, who appeared in much smaller numbers.

“Not your uterus, not your choice,” they shouted as a group formed a semicircle in front of the court building and girls and adults stepped forward. One took the megaphone and led the crowd in defiant chants about the ruling.

“I Dissent,” read one placard. Others demanded a “separation of church and state” and called for Congress to “codify Roe.” At one point, a man rode a bicycle through the assembly, disrupting a speech while playing religious music and displaying a “JESUS SAVES” sign. Protesters shouted back at him, “Abort the court!”

On First Street, 11-year-old Penelope Hall of Blacksburg, Va., took the megaphone in front of the Supreme Court to deliver her message: “The decision they made doesn’t affect them,” she said. “But it affects me and my friends and my family.”

The Supreme Court rolls back a right and inflames a divided country

Other protesters cheered loudly as she handed the megaphone to the next speaker. With her father, Nathan Hall, standing next to her, Penelope said she wanted to tell the court that abortion was her right. Nathan Hall, 44, said he was “proud of her confidence and that she was able to articulate her voice. One of her first dream jobs was to be on the Supreme Court to protect women’s rights.”

D.C. police said they had activated the full department — placing officers on standby in case of violence or vandalism — through the weekend. U.S. Capitol police said two people accused of throwing paint over the fence by the Supreme Court were arrested Saturday for destruction of property. And an abortion rights activist who had been atop the Frederick Douglass Memorial Bridge since Friday morning came down Saturday afternoon, according to D.C. police. He had been on top of the bridge for more than 24 hours.

On Friday, thousands of abortion rights supporters gathered in downtown Washington to assail the ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, in which a majority of the justices held that the Constitution does not guarantee the right to an abortion. Other marches to protest the decision unfolded in New York, Chicago, Nashville, San Francisco, Los Angeles and other cities. After the leak of a draft of the opinion last month, few were surprised. But many were still in shock.

Outside the court building Saturday, Kate Ireland, of Chevy Chase, Md., bounced her 2-year old daughter, Eleanor, on her lap as the crowd chanted, “My body, my choice!”

“Can you say it?” Ireland, 40, asked her daughter, as Eleanor looked around, eyes wide. They came with Kate’s sister, Elizabeth McNamee, 33, of the District, who is queer. Both sisters are also concerned about what other rights would be rolled back next, including same-sex marriage.

Ireland said she reads books with Eleanor about why people march and chant, and she hopes that the word “protest” is soon part of Eleanor’s vocabulary. “We want to keep your body safe,” she said, kissing her daughter’s head.

Abortion will soon be banned in 13 states. Here’s which could be next.

Outside the court in the immediate wake of the Dobbs ruling Friday captured Americans’ wildly divergent reactions to a watershed moment in one of the nation’s bitterest debates. Antiabortion activists brimmed with joy at a long-sought legal victory while supporters of abortion rights voiced fury and despair. Saturday brought a similar outpouring.

Antiabortion activist Randall Terry, founder of Operation Rescue, applauded the court’s ruling as he stood outside the building. He likened the justices’ decision to the Allies’ successful Normandy invasion in the fight against Nazi Germany in World War II, adding that ultimately he wants a federal law banning abortion nationwide.

The ruling “was a victory, but it’s like D-Day,” Terry said. “Our goal is to get to Berlin. Our mission is to make it illegal to kill a human being from conception until birth in all 50 states.”

Carol Foulke, who is old enough to remember World War II, came to First Street from Northern Virginia in a wheelchair being pushed by her daughter. “Social worker for abortion access,” her sign read.

It is “very important that as many people who feel as I do to get out here and let the government know we’re out here,” said Foulke, 93, as protesters, mostly women, approached to have their photos taken with her. “It’s going to be harder on the young people because they have lived with Roe v. Wade their whole lives,” she said. “They don’t know what it’s like to not have that.”

Caitlynn Sawilski, 19, drove from Dover, Del., with a sign she’d made in 2018 for the anti-gun violence March for Our Lives: “So you’re only pro-life when a uterus is involved?”

The other side of the sign said: “This is from four years ago, why am I still using it?”

“It is ridiculous that I have a sign that applies to trying to fight for gun safety and reproductive rights,” Sawilski said.

Tim Clement, of Oxnard, Calif., arrived in D.C. on Wednesday, anticipating the ruling overturning Roe. He said he was here to celebrate and, like Terry, to prepare for next steps. “Now the fight really begins,” said Clement, 49, a teacher and chaplain. “It’s about going forward, not backward. The laws of abortion need to change across the country. It’s a fight to change people’s minds.”

Mary Tretola-Johnson, 46, held a neon-green sign above her head saying she was a rape victim.

She said she was sexually abused for more than a year when she was a teenager. Although she did not get pregnant, she said, she thinks about what might have happened — and what might happen to others.

Emboldened Supreme Court majority shows it’s eager for change

“There will be girls, women, who are impregnated by sexual assault that will not be given a choice, and they have to carry that baby to term. It’s a lifetime of victimization that no man should ever have a voice in.”

Tretola-Johnson, of Upland, Calif., who has a 23-year-old daughter, said she cried and felt numb when the court’s ruling was announced.

“I can’t believe that is what God intended, not the God that I serve,” she said. “All I could think was, ‘Not in America.’ It was overwhelming.”

She added, “I’m hurt, I’m scared, and I want that to be heard.”

Like Tretola-Johnson, Amanda Kelly, 44, said she was a sexual-assault victim and was fortunate not to become pregnant as a result. But she did have two children at young age, she said, before a third unwanted pregnancy. “I was so poor, I couldn’t afford the abortion,” said Kelly, of Northern Virginia. “I was planning suicide because I couldn’t care for the kids that I had.”

She said her father eventually paid for an abortion, and she came to Saturday’s demonstration because “even these women who don’t know any better, I’m protecting their rights to make a choice.”

By evening in D.C. the crowd that swelled to nearly a thousand outside the Supreme Court dwindled to less than 200.

Elsewhere in the country, hundreds gathered in Willard Park next door to Cleveland City Hall on Saturday, coming from as far as Akron, an hour away, and carrying homemade signs that captured their unambiguous anger and unwillingness to accept Friday’s Supreme Court decision.

“I refuse to live in a country like this, and I’m not leaving,” read one.

“Guns have more rights than my uterus,” read another.

As speakers took the mic to deliver fiery speeches, the crowd chanted, “Never surrender! Abortion forever!”

Among several hundred protesters gathered at a park in Portland was 75-year-old Betty McArdle, who carried a sign that read, “I marched for Roe in 1972.”

She recalled protesting ahead of the 1973 Supreme Court decision decades ago and said it “ticks me off” to now be marching for abortion rights again.

“There are a lot of things that feel the same as 1972,” she said. The crowd stretched across age groups, including young children, and speakers took to a stage delivering speeches calling for the Supreme Court to be abolished.

In Austin, before an organized protest got underway in the early evening, a small crowd stood from hours in sweltering heat outside the Texas Capitol. One couple with three children showed up with placards saying “BABY LIVES MATTER,” but most signs and attendees were in support of abortion rights.

“I hope that people see the huge population of this country does not agree with this decision,” said Kara Herrmann, who was in town for a conference and joined protesters when she saw the news. “And then if we are supposed to be a free country for all, then we all need to be recognized.”

Andrea Simakis in Cleveland, Tuck Woodstock in Portland, Eva Ruth Moravec in Austin and Omari Daniels in Washington contributed to this report.

Roe v. Wade and abortion access in America

Roe v. Wade overturned: The Supreme Court has struck down Roe v. Wade, which for nearly 50 years has protected the right to abortion. Read the full decision here.

What happens next?: The legality of abortion will be left to individual states. That likely will mean 52 percent of women of childbearing age would face new abortion limits. Thirteen states with “trigger bans” will ban abortion within 30 days. Several other states where recent antiabortion legislation has been blocked by the courts are expected to act next.

State legislation: As Republican-led states move to restrict abortion, The Post is tracking legislation across the country on 15-week bans, Texas-style bans, trigger laws and abortion pill bans, as well as Democratic-dominated states that are moving to protect abortion rights enshrined in Roe v. Wade.

How our readers feel: In the hours that followed the ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, Washington Post readers responded in droves to a callout asking how they felt — and why.

Loading...