The Washington Post

Mariinsky’s ‘Cinderella’: A hard-edged fairy tale

Maria Shirinkina and Vladimir Shklyarov of the Mariinsky Ballet perform in “Cinderella.” (Katherine Frey/THE WASHINGTON POST)
Dance critic

With one look at the stage before Alexei Ratmansky’s “Cinderella” began Tuesday night, you knew you weren’t in for a fairy-tale treatment. The drop curtain shows a crowded, crudely painted city skyline, a prison of dark vertical lines and cramped tenements.

You can’t say he didn’t warn us. Ratmansky threads the theme of narrowness and confinement all through his ballet, from the steel-bounded dump where the heroine lives with her vulturous stepmother to the stiff, emotionally constipated posturing of the guests at the prince’s ball. With stark, modernist decor suggestive of the lean years of the 1930s — echoed in the thin, clingy costumes that emphasized bony angularity — the production’s design credo is total exposure. And what’s exposed is deliberately unlovely, for the most part.

Sarah L. Kaufman received the 2010 Pulitzer Prize for Criticism. She is the author of THE ART OF GRACE: On Moving Well Through Life. She has been The Washington Post's dance critic since 1996, and what moves her most is seeing grace happen where she least expects it. Learn more at and Facebook SarahLKaufmanWriter View Archive

This is not your daughter’s “Cinderella.” It may not be yours, either; empty seats materialized after each intermission. (With two of them, it’s a long evening.) If you found yourself wondering why the Mariinsky was bringing this work to the Kennedy Center Opera House for a second time, after its 2005 showing there, one reason may be the nostalgic connection that the ballet company feels toward the center itself.

Ten years ago, as he was readying “Cinderella” for its world premiere in St. Petersburg, Ratmansky traveled here with the Mariinsky (which was inaugurating its annual Washington visits with “Sleeping Beauty”) and finished making the ballet in the Kennedy Center’s rehearsal studios. Yuri Fateev, the company’s deputy director, related this to me with evident warmth Tuesday, saying he recalls the very studios in which Ratmansky created specific sections of “Cinderella.”

To the rest of the world in 2002, Ratmansky wasn’t yet the celebrated choreographer that he is now. But to those who knew him, as Fateev did, his gifts were obvious. It’s no surprise that memories of watching him in the throes of creativity left such a mark.

“Cinderella” is not a complete success. But it’s undone more by problems with Prokofiev’s music than by weaknesses in the concept. Ratmansky’s treatment echoes the sharp and piercing modernism in the score, which contains more aches and groans than fairy dust. But the musical world is not as fully realized as it was in “Romeo and Juliet,” which Prokofiev produced first, with more feeling. “Cinderella’s” music seems to wind around and around itself in spots, and in the face of its redundancies Ratmansky’s ideas are stretched thin. Solos at the ball for the stepsisters and stepmother run on to the point of dullness.

If the sharply restricted style wasn’t the most flattering vehicle to show off the strengths of the Mariinsky Ballet, the dancers dived into its grotesqueries with appetite. Ekaterina Kondaurova’s stepmother slashed across the stage, limbs like daggers.

With a discipline that may have been hard for the rest of the cast to swallow, Ratmansky reserved all aspects of warmth and beauty for two characters alone: Cinderella and her prince. His mistreated heroine dreams only vaguely of love. Her great hope, as Maria Shirinkina made clear in this role Tuesday, was for freedom. In a world of tight, clenched body language, freedom equates to grace. And so we saw Shirinkina tentatively soften and round her movements in her first solo, and then produce a glorious, full-blown unfolding of grace in her dance at the ball with Vladimir Shklyarov’s prince.

Shklyarov, who made a blazing entrance in white (all hail the Good Humor Man!), responds to Shirinkina by toning down his astounding virtuosity. In the ballet’s final moments, as Shklyarov opened up and grew more tender, you saw anxiety pass through Shirinkina, and then float away. And the two ended up in each other’s arms . . . on the floor. Not exactly a fairy-tale ending. But this was not exactly a fairy tale — it had hard edges, like life.

This production continues through Sunday, with cast changes.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read
Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
Unconventional warfare with a side of ale
It's in the details: Five ways to enhance your kitchen makeover
Play Videos
Drawing as an act of defiance
A fighter pilot helmet with 360 degrees of sky
Border collies: A 'mouse trap' for geese on the National Mall
Play Videos
Bao: The signature dish of San Francisco
This man's job is binge-watching for Netflix
What you need to know about Planned Parenthood
Play Videos
How to save and spend money at college
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
Europe's migrant crisis, explained

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.