The Washington Post

‘Non-Stop’ movie review: Old-fashioned fun on an overseas flight

Liam Neeson plays an air marshal on an international flight who tries to save passengers threatened by a murderous scheme in “Non-Stop.” (Myles Aronowitz)

Non-Stop” is by no means a perfect movie. Made for the multiplex, it’s a middlebrow murder mystery with a lot of “Airport” DNA in its genes. Still, Liam Neeson lends the effort a gravitas that makes it, at least by the standards of gimmicky thrillers, a perfectly entertaining antidote to all the Important Films that have been filling up your pre-Oscar-night to-do list.

The gimmick, in this case, is that the movie is an old-fashioned Agatha Christie novel set on an airplane.

With obvious correlations to such classics of detective fiction as “And Then There Were None” and “Murder on the Orient Express,” the film tells the story of an air marshal (Neeson) who must identify and thwart a passenger who is threatening, by text message, to kill one person on the plane every 20 minutes unless he receives $150 million. As with Christie’s most famous works, most of the main characters, including Neeson’s Bill Marks, a troubled alcoholic, initially draw our suspicion. The characters are either too cooperative, not cooperative enough, weirdly furtive, excessively flirty, hiding a dark secret or, in the zeitgeist-y case of one Middle Eastern-looking character (Omar Metwally), simply presumed to be guilty by ethnicity.

Of course, almost all of the suspects will eventually be proved innocent — several of them, as you might have guessed, by dying.

It works well enough, even if the movie — directed by Jaume Collet-Serra, from a screenplay by John W. Richardson, Christopher Roach and Ryan Engle — leans heavily on cliche. “Non-Stop” opens with a scene of a bleary-eyed Bill sitting sadly in his rain-streaked car, stirring a splash of whiskey into his coffee with a toothbrush as he touches a dog-eared photo of his absent family.

Wow. That’s a lot of back story to get out of the way in only 10 seconds, but the movie doesn’t have time to waste.

Mere minutes into his six-hour flight to London, Bill is dealing with the first of several corpses to crop up in a closed aircraft hurtling across the ocean at 500 mph. The extortion attempt — more killings will follow unless Bill manages to get a ransom transferred to a numbered bank account that turns out to be in his name — is carried out via an exchange of text messages that pop up onscreen, like little cartoon speech bubbles. It’s annoying at first, but you’ll get used to it. (You’d better. I suspect that more and more films will, like the recent “Fruitvale Station,” start to incorporate texting into their dialogue. Get ready for the first case where a movie catchphrase like “Hasta la vista, baby” comes accompanied by a cellphone alert tone.)

There are a number of plot twists and turns, the most satisfying of which have to do with wireless technology. Because the sender of the threatening messages appears to be someone on the plane, Bill’s detective work largely involves finding a person who is using a cellphone in the cabin. That is easier said than done, and it gives the movie, which is otherwise premised on the creakiest of concepts — the so-called “locked-room mystery” — a fresh, contemporary feeling. Collet-Serra, who directed Neeson in “Unknown,” has a knack for keeping things lively and moving forward. There are moments of humor, gripping action and real terror.

The cast — which like the “Airport” movies includes an old lady, a little girl and an assortment of other disaster-movie “types” — is bolstered by a nuanced performance by Julianne Moore as Bill’s more than slightly suspicious seatmate, as well as believable turns by many less-well-known supporting players.

But it’s the propulsive pace of the film and the nice sense of suspense it builds that help most in glossing over its failings. In addition to a series of preposterous plot coincidences that, in hindsight, strain even generous credulity, the film’s flaws include a motive that is ultimately revealed in what may be the most torturously reasoned politically themed speech ever delivered by a mad criminal mastermind at the climax of a movie. My response to hearing it was essentially the same as Bill’s. “You should have just handed out pamphlets,” he tells the murderer. “It would have been a lot easier.”

That’s certainly true, but the movie would have been a lot less fun.

★ ★ ½

PG-13. At area theaters. Contains violence, brief crude language, sensuality and drug references. 107 minutes.

Born and raised in Washington, D.C., Michael O’Sullivan has worked since 1993 at The Washington Post, where he covers art, film and other forms of popular — and unpopular — culture.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing