Which 2018 elections could affect redistricting
Use the map or the dropdown to explore other states
In ,
In many states, the winners of 2018 races for governor and state legislative seats will wield considerable power: The once-per-decade responsibility to redraw congressional maps.
After the 2020 Census provides an updated account of where people live, it will be up to the states to adjust their districts to fit that new reality. Elections to the U.S. House will operate under the new maps starting in 2022 and for the following 10 years.
In all, 29 governors and more than 800 state legislators who could have a hand in the new maps will be selected in November, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
In some states, the process has brought with it gerrymandering — the drawing of districts to advantage or disadvantage one party or race — tilting the makeup of the U.S. House and resulting in years of legal challenges.
How it works in each state
The most common method for mapping out changes vests power in the state legislature, with approval needed from the governor. This year, many of those states are electing at least a portion of their state Senate that will be in place for redistricting.
Some states have commissions intended to remove biased tinkering with the maps. And some sparsely populated states don’t need to draw districts at all.

Key 2018 races for redistricting:
Governor
Legislative
Both
None

Key 2018 races for redistricting:
Governor
Legislative
Both
None
State legislature
Districts are drawn by the state legislature, and often must be approved by the governor, though that is not always the case.

Politically appointed commissions
A group of commissioners appointed by legislative leaders or parties holds primary responsibility for the lines.

Independent commission
Districts are drawn by an independent commission. Members are appointed by nonpolitical state officials.

Single-district states
If the 2020 Census doesn’t show major population changes, these states will continue to have only one representative in the U.S. House, so they don’t need to draw districts.

Congressional seats are adjusted every 10 years to account for where people live. States gain or lose districts if large population shifts are shown in the decennial Census. The map below shows an estimate of how state totals might change after the 2020 Census.
States that are projected to gain or lose U.S. House seats in 2022

Key 2018 races for redistricting:
Governor
Legislative
Both
None
GAIN
LOSE
Alabama –1
Texas +3
Illinois –1
Florida +2
Michigan –1
Arizona +1
Minnesota –1
Colorado +1
New York –1
North Carolina +1
Ohio –1
Oregon +1
Pennsylvania –1
Rhode Island –1
W. Virginia –1

Key 2018 races for redistricting:
Governor
Legislative
Both
None
OR
+1
MN
–1
NY
–1
MI
–1
RI –1
PA
–1
OH
–1
IL
–1
CO
+1
WV
–1
NC
+1
AZ
+1
AL
–1
TX
+3
FL
+2
Census estimates that reflect how people have shifted since 2010 show states in the Mid-Atlantic and Midwest losing seats and states in the South and West gaining them.
Boundaries are also adjusted to account for movement within states. (States need to go through this process for state-level legislative districts as well, though they don’t necessarily handle it the same way.)
In the past, politicians have drawn favorable maps that can misrepresent the share of votes for each party in a state. For instance, if a state loses a seat after the next census, members of a strong majority party could combine two districts currently held by the minority party.
Unless the governor is a member of the minority party and has veto power, there’s little that can be done to stop the maps from proceeding, short of going to court.
[How gerrymandering could decide whether your vote counts]
That’s why who controls state government come 2021 could have a big effect on how fair the maps are.
As it stands, Republicans control both houses of the state legislature and the governorship in 26 states, with Democrats in full control in only eight. In the rest, control is split.
The governor of
Where one party controls the governorship and state houses

26
Republican control
FL
ID
IN
AL
AZ
AR
GA
IA
KS
MI
MO
NE
MS
NH
KY
ND
OH
OK
TX
TN
UT
WV
WI
SC
SD
WY
16
SPLIT control
CO
IL
AK
LA
MN
MT
ME
MD
MA
PA
NV
NC
NM
VT
NY
VA
8
DEMOCRATIC control
CA
DE
NJ
OR
RI
WA
CT
HI

Republican
control
SPLIT
control
DEMOCRATIC
control
26
16
8
CO
IL
HI
NJ
AK
LA
FL
AL
AZ
AR
GA
ME
CA
CT
DE
NV
MN
MT
ID
IN
KY
OR
RI
IA
KS
WA
MD
MA
MI
PA
MO
NE
NY
MS
NC
NH
NM
VT
SC
ND
OH
OK
SD
VA
TX
TN
UT
WV
WI
WY
Notes: Connecticut’s state Senate is a tie, but the tiebreaker goes to Democrats. Nebraska’s sole legislative chamber is technically nonpartisan but Republican in practice. One Democratic state senator in New York caucuses with Republicans, giving them control of the chamber.
Studies have shown that gerrymandering has happened more frequently in Republican states, but Democratic-controlled states are not immune.
Twelve states have been the subject of litigation this year related to the fairness of their maps. Maryland and Wisconsin maps were recently considered by the U.S. Supreme Court. Pennsylvanians will be voting under a new congressional map after the state’s Supreme Court recently redrew the boundaries.
Many of these states have both gubernatorial and legislative races this year that will determine who plays a role in redistricting.
States that have had recent legal challenges to their current maps

Key 2018 races for redistricting:
Governor
Both
None
WI
MI
PA
OH
MD
VA
NC
AR
GA
AL
TX
LA
HI

Key 2018 races for redistricting:
Governor
Legislative
Both
None
WI
MI
PA
OH
VA
MD
NC
AR
GA
AL
TX
LA
HI
In some states, citizens or lawmakers are trying to change the way they redistrict to make the process less susceptible to partisanship. An Ohio constitutional amendment that raises the level of bipartisanship required to approve a congressional map passed in May. Colorado, Michigan, Missouri and Utah will have reform measures on the ballot in November.
These reforms, if passed, would alter the power of state legislators to draw maps favorable to certain groups.
But if they fail, and in many other states, the 2018 elections will be an important indicator of whether there will be a check on maps that could govern political power across the country for the next 10 years.
Which 2018 elections could affect redistricting
Click on a column to sort the list.
* States with a single congressional district will not need to draw new boundaries unless they gain a seat in the next Census.
This story has been updated to reflect split control of New York. One Democratic state senator caucuses with Republicans, giving them the majority in the chamber. Also, Connecticut’s governor cannot veto congressional lines, so that race will not affect redistricting.
About this story
Data showing when state legislators and governors who will redistrict are going to be elected, number of key legislative elections per state (as of Aug. 7) and state balance of power (as of July 10) from National Conference of State Legislatures. Redistricting types and pending litigation from the Brennan Center for Justice.
Additional information from Wendy Underhill, redistricting expert at NCSL, and Laura Royden, a researcher formerly of the Brennan Center.
U.S. House reapportionment projections come from Election Data Services, Inc. The 2020 projections are based on population trends in Census estimates from 2014 to 2017.
Governor race rankings from the Cook Political Report.
More stories
Where do you draw the lines?
In most states, elected officials draw district lines to benefit politicians or parties. But California handed that power to ordinary citizens and other states are considering it.
Here's how the Supreme Court could decide whether your vote will count
The Supreme Court will hear a case about whether Wisconsin Republicans gave themselves a guaranteed GOP majority when they redrew the state’s legislative districts in 2011. It could have big implications.
PA-18 will be split in four come November. Here’s why Tuesday’s special election still matters.
A win or even a close loss will be taken as good news for the Democrats