Climate change has boosted the cost of flood damage caused by heavy rainfall in the United States by $75 billion over the past three decades, accounting for about a third of total losses, Stanford University researchers say.
“The more global warming we get, the more we can expect these damages to increase — and reductions [in emissions] will have value in terms of avoided costs,” said climate scientist Noah Diffenbaugh, co-author of a new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Total U.S. flood costs from heavy rainfall between 1988 and 2017 are estimated at $199 billion, and the losses have surged as climate warming speeds up the planet’s water cycle, driving more extreme precipitation.
Flooding is the most common weather-related disaster threat in the United States.
Researchers, however, have long struggled to determine how much of the rising costs are due to additional housing development to serve a growing population, as well as increases in property values.
The Stanford University team developed a model to analyze changes in these economic indicators and to extract them, so as to clarify the role of climate change.
The model developed could similarly be used to calculate the contribution of climate change to wildfire losses or reductions in crop yields from rising temperatures, if long-term data records are available, Diffenbaugh said.
Evidence that global warming is already driving more than a third of U.S. flood losses from heavy rainfall — the study did not look at flooding related to sea level rise — should push governments to step up emissions reductions and prepare for flood risks, he said.
Researchers said most of the growing climate-linked losses were not being driven by overall increases in rainfall but by hikes in extreme rainfall events.
“What we find is that, even in states where the long-term mean precipitation hasn’t changed, in most cases the wettest events have intensified,” said Frances Davenport, an Earth system science graduate student and co-author of the study.
That is increasing the financial damages relative to what would have occurred without the precipitation shifts, she said.
Besides curbing global warming, efforts to avoid building new homes on vulnerable floodplains could also limit losses, as the two go hand-in-hand, she added.
— Thomson Reuters Foundation