The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness

Covid-19 affected female and early-career scientists more, study shows

(iStock)
Placeholder while article actions load

On March 6, 2020, universities across the United States announced systematic laboratory closures, social distancing policies and travel bans to cope with the growing epidemic. These actions, while prudent and necessary, had immediate negative effects on the academic enterprise of science in the country and around the world.

We are a team of researchers who study the role of science and technology in society. We are also part of a collaborative, multi-university project, called SciOPS, that seeks to improve how scientists communicate with the public. As the pandemic wore on, researchers began telling us about the work stoppages, data losses and other hardships they were experiencing. We felt this was important information, so we conducted two surveys to understand how the pandemic was affecting researchers.

The pandemic is rewriting the rules of science. But at what cost?

The pandemic’s hardships in academia have been widespread and lasting, but our analyses revealed that female and early career scientists faced more negative effects than other groups. These differences are possibly aggravating already existing disparities and potentially altering career trajectories. The negative outcomes may last well beyond the end of the pandemic.

A survey of researchers

The SciOPS team conducted its first covid-19 survey in May 2020, with a follow-up exactly a year later. For each, we invited faculty from a random sample of 21 U.S. research universities who work in biology, engineering and biochemistry to participate in the study, and about 300 scientists responded each time. Through multiple choice and open-ended questions, the surveys asked how researchers had been affected both professionally and personally by the pandemic.

How covid disrupted science

Our first survey found that disruptions at work and home negatively affected research activities for a vast majority of the scientists who responded.

On the research side, 93 percent of respondents experienced university shutdowns and 88 percent faced lab work disruptions. Over 80 percent dealt with conference cancellations and travel restrictions. Some researchers also had to quickly adapt to financial issues, and this, along with other hurdles, saw many scientists delaying data collection, applying for timeline extensions or ending data collection early.

Challenges at home also affected scientists’ work. Roughly 80 percent of respondents said they were unable to concentrate on research activities, 72 percent had anxiety about contracting the coronavirus and 36 percent had to manage unexpected child-care responsibilities.

Women are systematically excluded from global coronavirus coverage, experts say

The May 2021 survey showed that a year later, not much had changed. Responses were nearly identical: 92 percent of scientists reported difficulties from university closures, 89 percent experienced lab work disruptions and 84 percent had collaboration disruptions that had interrupted their research over the past year.

Issues at home were nearly the same as the year prior, too. The only major difference was that 11 percent of respondents reported coping with a family member’s illness, compared with only 3 percent in 2020.

Inevitably, these stressors took a toll on researchers’ well-being.

Nearly 60 percent indicated that their overall mental health and happiness had decreased because of the pandemic. This is higher than a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study that found 40 percent of the U.S. general public were facing mental health issues in June.

As one researcher said, reiterating the sentiments of many others in our study: “The mental impact of lockdown affected every researcher in my lab, including me. It was far more damaging than anything else we experienced and caused huge drop-offs in productivity.”

Female, early career faculty

Some scientists felt the added stress from a lack of boundaries between home and work much more acutely than others. The unexpected rises in parental child care and virtual schooling fell most heavily on female and early career faculty.

Coronavirus child-care crisis will set women back a generation

In our 2020 survey, 34 percent of female scientists reported disruptions because of unexpected child-care responsibilities, compared with 21 percent of males. Early career faculty struggled more, too. Roughly 43 percent of assistant professors indicated unexpected child-care duties caused major disruptions to their research, 30 percent more than their most senior colleagues.

In total, nearly 50 percent of both female respondents and assistant professors reported an inability to concentrate on research activities, while only 29 percent of male colleagues and 36 percent of senior colleagues reported the same.

These unequal burdens barely changed between 2020 and 2021. If anything, issues got worse for female scientists. Many reported other unanticipated complications such as management of other family members’ mental health, divorce and limited space at home.

Given the extra burdens young researchers and female researchers are facing, it’s no surprise their work suffered. Other research has shown that during the pandemic, female scientists had significantly less time to work on research. Many were not able to meet deadlines, and so they submitted fewer manuscripts compared with pre-pandemic levels.

Unsurprisingly, these impacts on productivity were even worse for women with children. Research has shown that home disruptions can cascade over time and result in delayed promotions and tenure. Even pre-covid-19, working mothers in academia left their respective fields at much higher rates than their male colleagues, and this trend was further amplified by the pandemic.

Adapting to the new world

Undoubtedly, the pandemic has had devastating effects on academic research and those who do it. But hidden among the gloom of our surveys were a few bright spots that highlight the resilience of the scientific community.

In our 2020 survey, 37 percent of scientists said that they developed new research topics to pursue, and 22 percent developed new collaborations. Virtual meetings proved to be a valuable transition for some. As one researcher noted, “Through regular videoconference discussions, new and long-distance collaborations have been initiated and maintained between four labs in the U.S. This would have been never envisaged prior to the Zoom era.”

The pandemic highlighted existing problems within science but also offered lessons to be learned. Many in academia want to avoid deepening existing inequities in the scientific workforce, and studies have outlined ways to do this. By implementing programs such as tenure clock extensions, advocating for affordable child care and allocating funds to support early career female researchers, the scientific community could enable broader participation, capacity and production for all scientists.

Looking forward, we believe it is critically important for universities and research funders to proactively address the continuing challenges posed by the pandemic, particularly for female and early career faculty. With so much in flux, there is an opportunity to change and improve a system that wasn’t working for a lot of people before the pandemic.

Michalegko is research project manager of public policy at Arizona State University; Welch is professor and director at the Center for Science, Technology & Environmental Policy Studies at Arizona State University; Feeney is professor and Lincoln professor of ethics in public affairs at Arizona State University; Johnson is professor emeritus of public administration at University of Illinois at Chicago.

This article was originally published on theconversation.com.

Loading...