The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness

Local journalism needs a coronavirus stimulus plan, too

A Seattle Times newspaper box in front of the building that houses the Times’s newsroom on March 15. The front-page headline reads “Silence in Seattle.”
A Seattle Times newspaper box in front of the building that houses the Times’s newsroom on March 15. The front-page headline reads “Silence in Seattle.” (Ted S. Warren/AP)

It’s a harsh paradox.

Media readership and viewership is soaring as citizens seek life-or-death information about the coronavirus: Where to get tested? Does my hospital have enough ventilators? Is it safe to go outside?

But the accompanying economic decline is killing off advertising — for restaurants, cars, travel, entertainment — and other support that has kept many news organizations going.

For some, the events of the past few weeks have already proved too much for their fragile existence. Alternative weeklies have stopped printing. Local dailies are laying off staff at already decimated newsrooms. Many others, including digital-only newsrooms, are hanging on by a thread.

It’s happening around the world: Newspapers in Australia and Britain announced in the past few days that they were going out of business or suspending print publication.

“Journalists are essential in this moment,” Craig Aaron, president and co-CEO of Free Press, a Washington-based advocacy nonprofit, told me in an interview. “We need to keep reporters working, and we have to do it now.”

Cleveland’s double crisis — coronavirus and a shrinking number of reporters to cover it

Toward that end, Aaron is pressing for a variety of steps that might have seemed radical just weeks ago. His proposal, published last week in the Columbia Journalism Review, includes doubling federal funds for public media, direct support for newsrooms committed to local coverage and the establishment of a “First Amendment Fund” to support new approaches to newsgathering.

He’s not alone in looking for immediate answers and advocating for help.

“Wash your hands. Don’t touch your face. And buy a subscription to your local newspaper.”

That’s the advice Steven Waldman and Charles Sennott offered to citizens in an Atlantic piece titled “The Coronavirus Is Killing Local News.”

Waldman is co-founder of Report for America, and Sennott is CEO of the GroundTruth Project, both organizations dedicated to strengthening journalism. They do not believe that the federal government should “bail out” newsrooms. But “future stimulus plans should include steps that help save local news organizations,” they wrote. Among them: The government “should include in its future stimulus plans $500 million in spending for public-health ads through local media.”

Even now, the federal government spends large amounts on public-service ads for military recruitment and census participation. “The government will be buying an effective way of getting health messages to the public,” they wrote.

They also called for national and community foundations, as well as private philanthropists, to create special funds for news organizations or increase current spending.

They note that foundations are already required to spend 5 percent of their endowments on grants each year, but now it’s time to go beyond that: “Going above that 5 percent target would unleash millions of dollars.”

And individuals should not only subscribe to local news organizations, but also donate to nonprofit news organizations such as Web-based investigative newsrooms.

“The newspapers whose websites you keep refreshing need to keep operating,” wrote Amber Hunt, a Pulitzer-winning investigative reporter for the Cincinnati Enquirer, as she urged people to subscribe to several news organizations if they could. “Ads are disappearing, and who knows when they’ll be back.”

The future of local newspapers just got bleaker. Here’s why we can’t let them die.

The current advertising decline comes at a time when news organizations are already in deep trouble, mostly because of the precipitous decline in advertising revenue, which has migrated to the largest technology platforms, such as Facebook and Google, for many years.

Some news organizations, including some of the largest national newspapers, seem to be on a solid footing for now.

But more than 2,000 newspapers have closed over the past 15 years, and a growing number of American counties are now deemed news deserts — places where there is no regular source of local news.

Many others are still hanging on, but sometimes in name only, their editorial ranks so diminished that they are seen as “ghost newspapers.”

News-industry experts have been predicting for years that a recession or severe economic downturn would deliver a death blow to these already troubled businesses. And now a public health crisis has come along to threaten exactly that.

“The Coronavirus Is a Media Extinction Event” headlined Craig Silverman’s piece in BuzzFeed News, describing the advertising free fall — and readership surge — at the Seattle Times, which has been delivering outstanding coverage in one of the virus’s epicenters. (BuzzFeed itself is cutting staff pay through May as it tries to avoid layoffs amid the downturn; CEO Jonah Peretti said he would forgo his salary for that period.)

“Virtually all entertainment advertising is gone, restaurants gone,” and car advertising way down, Seattle Times President Alan Fisco told Silverman.

It’s a dire situation, the effects of which certainly can’t be fully reversed. At most, the worst outcomes might be kept at bay for now.

I don’t know whether any of the proposals for doing that would be successful.

But at a time when good reporting has seldom been more vital and more threatened, I do know that we need to try our damnedest.

Read more:

The media must stop live-broadcasting Trump’s dangerous, destructive coronavirus briefings

Surrounded by experts, Trump still needed an intervention by Tucker Carlson to take coronavirus seriously

The real reason Chris Matthews had to go

For more by Margaret Sullivan visit

Coronavirus: What you need to know

Vaccines: The CDC recommends that everyone age 5 and older get an updated covid booster shot designed to target both the original virus and the omicron variant. Here’s some guidance on when you should get the omicron booster and how vaccine efficacy could be affected by your prior infections.

Variants: Instead of a single new Greek letter variant, a group of immune-evading omicron spinoffs are popping up all over the world. Any dominant variant will likely knock out monoclonal antibodies, targeted drugs that can be used as a treatment or to protect immunocompromised people.

Tripledemic: Hospitals are overwhelmed by a combination of respiratory illnesses, staffing shortages and nursing home closures. And experts believe the problem will deteriorate further in coming months. Here’s how to tell the difference between RSV, the flu and covid-19.

Guidance: CDC guidelines have been confusing — if you get covid, here’s how to tell when you’re no longer contagious. We’ve also created a guide to help you decide when to keep wearing face coverings.

Where do things stand? See the latest coronavirus numbers in the U.S. and across the world. In the U.S., pandemic trends have shifted and now White people are more likely to die from covid than Black people. Nearly nine out of 10 covid deaths are people over the age 65.

For the latest news, sign up for our free newsletter.