The Washington Post

Carolyn Hax: Teen’s adult activity on school trip a dilemma for chaperones


Hi, Carolyn: My husband and I recently chaperoned a five-day high school trip. The daughter of some friends was one of the students. She has had a contentious relationship with her parents, and was distant with us and the other chaperones.

On the trip, she made it abundantly clear she is in a relationship with another female student. There were some sleeping-arrangement issues we had to deal with.

Carolyn Hax started her advice column in 1997, after five years as a copy editor and news editor in Style and none as a therapist. The column includes cartoons by "relationship cartoonist" Nick Galifianakis -- Carolyn's ex-husband -- and appears in over 200 newspapers. View Archive

On our return, I told her I respect her privacy but don’t want to keep secrets from her parents. I asked if she had told them of her relationship. She has not and does not plan to. I told her that puts us in a bit of a dilemma, that I wasn’t going to go out of my way to tell them, but I wasn’t going to lie to them, either. I suggested if she needed someone to talk to, she could talk to us. Her only response was, “Please don’t tell them.” Then she walked away.

We believe the parents would treat her relationship the same as a heterosexual relationship, so the issues are probably less about her sexual preferences and more about control and getting away with sleeping with her lover because her parents think they’re just friends.

I need advice on how to handle this with her parents. We don’t get to see them often, but are in a club together. We don’t want to out a sullen, alienated teenager and I don’t want to be a busybody. On the other hand, I would be upset if my daughter were engaging in adult activity at this age, and if I were the last to know. Suggestions?

(Nick Galafianakis/For The Washington Post)

What Happens in Vegas . . .

You got the answer right the first time: Don’t volunteer anything, don’t lie when asked. That honors your role as chaperone (disclosure for major rule-
breaking, discretion for the rest) and as the parents’ friend (no deception). If the daughter were in harm’s way you’d have to tell, but she isn’t.

There is one unturned stone here that might be useful to turn. You say, “I would be upset . . . if I were the last to know.” Have you asked yourself why?

Sure, it’s embarrassing to discover everyone knew something but you, I get that. Not only does it alert you that you’re more out than in, but it also reminds you that everyone else sees your out-ness — though that’s more about ego than anything else.

For parents, there’s an added element of worry in being last, because it tells you, among other possibilities, that your kids aren’t sharing, don’t trust you, aren’t as close to you as you thought, or might keep you in the dark until there’s real trouble, and even after. These are certainly significant in ways ego-bruising isn’t, but: When a third party steps in with the missing information, as you’ve considered doing here, what does that fix?

It doesn’t move the child to share, establish trust, or draw closer to a parent — not unless the family involved deals with the underlying problem between them. They’re aware there is one, presumably, since the relationship is “contentious.”

And whether telling enables a family to solve such problems is certainly debatable. Sure, reporting the daughter’s relationship to the parents could get them talking toward a resolution, but it could also get them yelling and the daughter withdrawing even further from her parents’ influence and embrace.

Again, barring imminent danger, kids need privacy — even secrets, to a degree — to work things out at a pace that suits them.

If taking this position gets you in trouble when your friends find out what you knew and when, you have this: “I believed it was for Daughter to share with you, and argued for that. I made a judgment call, because if ever you’re in my place, that’s what I’d want.” Yes?

Adults, meanwhile, would do well to resist the temptation to care whether they’re first, fifth or 40th to receive a bit of news. When being left out is meaningful, it is so only as a symptom. Instead of dwelling on the what, work instead on mending the why.

Hi, Carolyn: The significant other and I have been planning to move in together for some time, but now I’m feeling less enthusiastic about the prospect. He’s been working longer hours, taking a night class, we’ve seen each other less, he’s called/
e-mailed less often.

I’ve pointed out that I need more attention, now, and he agrees, but goes back to full focus on his stuff. I feel less and less like a partner and more like a weekend distraction. Guidance?


Two-word guidance: Be realistic.

Be realistic about how much energy an employed-full-time student will have for you, and be realistic about how he’s treating you. There’s devotion despite being slammed (temporarily) by other responsibilities, and there’s moving on (permanently) to other things. Shelve the move till you figure out which you have.

Write to Carolyn Hax, Style, 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20071, or Get her column delivered to your inbox each morning at

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.