The Washington Post

A pox on both parties for partisan redistricting


A divided Congress returned to work this week amid national unhappiness over partisan stalemate. Meanwhile, back home in most states — including Maryland and Virginia — Democrats and Republicans alike were busy redrawing congressional and state legislative districts in ways that usually ensure the gridlock gets even worse.

It happens every 10 years, when voting districts are adjusted to reflect population figures from the latest census. The two main political parties control the process in most places and hope the public doesn’t pay too much attention.

Robert McCartney is The Post’s senior regional correspondent, covering politics and policy in the greater Washington, D.C area. View Archive

There’s little or no effective input from independent outsiders who would put fairness or other civic values ahead of narrow political self-interest.

“It’s a pox on both their houses. It’s not about good government. It’s not about democracy. It’s about control,” said Donald F. Norris, chairman of the department of public policy at the University of Maryland Baltimore County.

In Maryland, the all-powerful Democratic Party plans to fiddle with the map to try to boost its majority in the U.S. House delegation from 6-2 to 7-1. That would leave the GOP with only one-eighth of the seats in a state where more than two in five voters picked Republican Bob Ehrlich for governor in 2010.

Virginia Republicans — who are dominant, but not totally — hope to lock in an 8-3 congressional majority. Success would mean they keep 73 percent of the seats, after receiving only 54 percent of total votes in House races in 2010.

The political parties achieve these tricks by gerrymandering, or drawing bizarrely shaped districts designed to protect incumbents or unseat rivals. They do so regardless of whether the lines reflect county or municipal boundaries or whether they break up such groups as minority populations or rural voters.

“It’s very difficult to completely extract politics from anything. But I think we could do a far better job of preserving geographical communities of interest and make the lines more understandable to voters,” said Bob Holsworth, who chaired Virginia’s bipartisan redistricting commission.

The General Assembly set aside the group’s recommendations in the spring, choosing instead to put forth competing partisan proposals.

The practice tends to drive politicians to ideological extremes. The parties safeguard incumbents by creating districts that are so lopsided that politicians needn’t worry about the other side in a general election. Instead, they end up focusing on the party primary and cater to the base.

“It often becomes true that the real risk that an incumbent faces is not being beaten by the other party, but being challenged from within the party, in all likelihood by someone who’s more extreme,” said lawyer Paul Smith, a partner at Jenner & Block and co-author of a redistricting manual published by the American Bar Association.

An important byproduct is a chronic lack of ideological give-and-take in campaigns. One party barely bothers to make an effort in many races, because the result is preordained.

Stephen Shapiro, a local Democratic Party official in Bethesda, testified to that at a redistricting hearing in Rockville last month.

“In some respects, the current congressional districts have made my job as a Democratic precinct chair too easy. My candidates always win — at least in the general election,” Shapiro said. “I am concerned that it is decreasing debate and turnout. Most of the competition is in our primary elections, where there is relative agreement among most candidates.”

Quentin Kidd, a political science professor at Christopher Newport University in Newport News, estimated that three-quarters of seats in the Virginia House of Delegates are noncompetitive. “That can’t be good for the democratic process. There’s really no debate over policy, no clash of ideas going on,” he said.

None of this will change until the public insists on it. In U.S. House redistricting, both national parties are so keen on trying to secure an advantage ahead of 2012 that other concerns are ignored.

“At the moment, the pressure from on top is so great on Republican- and Democratic-controlled states to bolster the party numbers that all other state-based or population-based interests are being pushed to the back burner,” said Todd Eberly, a political science professor at St. Mary’s College.

It’s almost certainly too late to fix this for the current decade. The public should start now to demand a fairer, more neutral method after the 2020 Census.

I discuss local issues at 8:51 a.m. Friday on WAMU (88.5 FM).


Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read


Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
How to make Sean Brock's 'Heritage' cornbread
New limbs for Pakistani soldiers
The signature dish of Charleston, S.C.
Play Videos
Why seasonal allergies make you miserable
John Lewis, 'Marv the Barb' and the politics of barber shops
What you need to know about filming the police
Play Videos
The Post taste tests Pizza Hut's new hot dog pizza
5 tips for using your thermostat
Michael Bolton's cinematic serenade to Detroit
Play Videos
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
The signature drink of New Orleans

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.